Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dummy: test if assigning a value to a parameter is caught by linter #257

Closed

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Nov 6, 2023

Overview

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Minor adjustment to the Blobstream contract for improved performance.

@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
@rach-id rach-id requested a review from adlerjohn as a code owner November 6, 2023 16:43
@rach-id rach-id marked this pull request as draft November 6, 2023 16:43
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Walkthrough

The change in the Blobstream contract is minor and straightforward. The _newNonce variable has been assigned a value of 1. This alteration does not seem to significantly affect the contract's logic or functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/Blobstream.sol The _newNonce variable is now assigned a value of 1. This change does not significantly impact the contract's logic or functionality.

Poem

🍂 On this day, as autumn leaves fall,
A tiny change was made, so small.
In Blobstream's code, a tweak was done,
_newNonce is now set to one. 🐇

No big impact, no cause for fright,
Just a rabbit coding in the moonlight. 🌙
Celebrating this day in history,
With a change wrapped in mystery.

So here's to autumn, crisp and bright,
And to code that's just right. 🍁
Remember, even the smallest alteration,
Can bring about a new creation. 🎉


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 856a9e5 and 0071113.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Blobstream.sol (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Blobstream.sol

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant