Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary duplicate repo definitions for centos9 #755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

dmick
Copy link
Member

@dmick dmick commented Apr 19, 2024

CentOS 8 had different .repo files for each major section (BaseOS, AppStream, etc.). CentOS 9 has apparently moved to a single file, centos.repo. This change 1) removes the management of separate repo files for BaseOS and AppStream, since those repos are included in centos.repo, and 2) stops using the perhaps-questionable single baseurl in favor of the default metalink/mirrors setup

There are errors occurring for teuthology tests on centos9 that may be related to this, with the errors of the form " from does not belong to a distupgrade repository". As near as I can tell, a "distupgrade repository" is one used only for upgrade, and I can't find information on how exactly it's indicated, so I don't know if this change will resolve the error or not.

CentOS 8 had different .repo files for each major section (BaseOS,
AppStream, etc.).  CentOS 9 has apparently moved to a single file,
centos.repo.  This change 1) removes the management of separate repo files
for BaseOS and AppStream, since those repos are included in centos.repo,
and 2) stops using the perhaps-questionable single baseurl in favor of
the default metalink/mirrors setup

There are errors occurring for teuthology tests on centos9 that may
be related to this, with the errors of the form "<pkg> from <repo>
does not belong to a distupgrade repository".  As near as I can tell,
a "distupgrade repository" is one used only for upgrade, and I can't
find information on how exactly it's indicated, so I don't know if this
change will resolve the error or not.

Signed-off-by: Dan Mick <[email protected]>
@dmick dmick requested a review from akraitman April 19, 2024 02:23
@akraitman akraitman merged commit cefb3c9 into ceph:main Apr 19, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants