Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: clarify the operator design doc a bit #167

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

obnoxxx
Copy link
Collaborator

@obnoxxx obnoxxx commented Nov 7, 2024

I the operator design document, custom resource definition(CRD) seems to have been used as a synonym for custom resource(CR) which is usually not correct.

This change makes the wording a little clearer by using CRD only when technically correct and using CR when appropriate.

Describe what this PR does

Make some wording in the operator design doc a little clearer and more correct.

Is there anything that requires special attention

no

Do you have any questions?

no

Is the change backward compatible?

yes

Are there concerns around backward compatibility?

no

Provide any external context for the change, if any.

none

Related issues

none

Future concerns

none

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow
    guidelines in the developer
    guide
    .
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull
    Request
  • Pending release
    notes

    updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next major release.
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

docs/design/operator.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
I the operator design document, custom resource definition(CRD) seems to have been used as a synonym
for custom resource(CR) which is usually not correct.

This change makes the wording a little clearer  by using CRD only when
technically correct and using CR when appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <[email protected]>

Update docs/design/operator.md

Co-authored-by: nb-ohad <[email protected]>
@obnoxxx obnoxxx requested a review from nb-ohad November 7, 2024 12:24
@nb-ohad nb-ohad merged commit 9287afb into ceph:main Nov 7, 2024
12 checks passed
@obnoxxx obnoxxx deleted the design-crd-vs-cr branch November 7, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants