Hok is a CLI implementation of Scoop in Rust
🚧 CAVEAT: Under heavy development, interfaces may change without notice.
Assuming you have the original Scoop installed, simply run:
scoop bucket add dorado https://github.com/chawyehsu/dorado
scoop install dorado/hokNote this will add the dorado bucket I maintain to install Hok. Hok is experimental and it's currently only available in that bucket.
The command line interface is similar to Scoop.
$ hok help
Hok is a CLI implementation of Scoop in Rust
Usage: hok.exe <COMMAND>
Commands:
bucket Manage manifest buckets
cache Package cache management
cat Inspect the manifest of a package
cleanup Cleanup apps by removing old versions
config Configuration management
hold Hold package(s) to disable changes
home Browse the homepage of a package
info Show package(s) basic information
install Install package(s)
list List installed package(s)
search Search available package(s)
unhold Unhold package(s) to enable changes
uninstall Uninstall package(s)
update Fetch and update subscribed buckets
upgrade Upgrade installed package(s)
help Print this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
Options:
-h, --help Print help
-V, --version Print version
Type 'hok help <command>' to get help for a specific command.
Prerequisites: Git, Rust
# clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/chawyehsu/hok
cd hok
# build
cargo build
# run and test
cargo run -- helpHok (also the libscoop backend) aims to provide a faster yet powerful alternative to the original Scoop. Here are some random benchmarks captured in the Windows Sandbox environment on my PC (AMD Ryzen 5 2600, 32G RAM, Windows 10).
# versions:
hok/dorado 0.1.0-beta.6
scoop-search/main 1.5.0
sfsu/extras 1.14.0
# Benchmarking scoop bucket list
Benchmark 1: scoop bucket list
Time (mean ± σ): 5.610 s ± 0.627 s [User: 6.573 s, System: 3.520 s]
Range (min … max): 4.784 s … 7.063 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: hok bucket list
Time (mean ± σ): 159.4 ms ± 28.3 ms [User: 86.4 ms, System: 175.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 140.0 ms … 252.1 ms 18 runs
Summary
hok bucket list ran
35.19 ± 7.38 times faster than scoop bucket list
# Benchmarking scoop list
Benchmark 1: scoop list
Time (mean ± σ): 3.577 s ± 0.043 s [User: 4.919 s, System: 2.142 s]
Range (min … max): 3.524 s … 3.678 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: sfsu list
Time (mean ± σ): 58.3 ms ± 30.8 ms [User: 18.8 ms, System: 44.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 234.1 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 3: hok list
Time (mean ± σ): 48.7 ms ± 53.2 ms [User: 13.4 ms, System: 41.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 31.8 ms … 412.4 ms 62 runs
Summary
hok list ran
1.20 ± 1.45 times faster than sfsu list
73.39 ± 80.11 times faster than scoop list
# Benchmarking scoop search (sqlite_cache enabled)
Benchmark 1: scoop search google
Time (mean ± σ): 3.771 s ± 0.031 s [User: 5.134 s, System: 2.085 s]
Range (min … max): 3.725 s … 3.830 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: scoop-search google
Time (mean ± σ): 178.5 ms ± 14.2 ms [User: 210.8 ms, System: 850.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 149.4 ms … 206.8 ms 17 runs
Benchmark 3: sfsu search google
Time (mean ± σ): 73.7 ms ± 30.1 ms [User: 49.3 ms, System: 85.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 52.6 ms … 202.3 ms 36 runs
Benchmark 4: hok search google
Time (mean ± σ): 73.0 ms ± 10.2 ms [User: 44.9 ms, System: 93.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 63.0 ms … 109.3 ms 25 runs
Summary
hok search google ran
1.01 ± 0.44 times faster than sfsu search google
2.44 ± 0.39 times faster than scoop-search google
51.63 ± 7.25 times faster than scoop search googleYou may run the benchmarks yourself using provided benchmark scripts in the
scripts directory. Results may vary on different environments, feel free
to share yours to help us improve the project.
hok © Chawye Hsu. Released under the Apache-2.0 license. For licenses of sub crates, see COPYING.
Blog · GitHub @chawyehsu · Twitter @chawyehsu