You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear author,hello.The pretrained model Voxel-MAE you proposed is very ingenious.I'm trying to replicate your work.
我做了两组实验:
实验1:SECOND训练20轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND20轮,后者效果显著好于前者。
实验2:SECOND训练200轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND200轮,前者效果好于后者。
考虑到训练过拟合,我又补充实验3:SECOND训练80轮,发现其在Car和骑行者的检测结果好于SECOND训练200轮,但是在行人检测上SECOND训练200轮效果更好。
我很疑惑,目前怀疑训练过拟合,但是我无法将loss曲线与eval准确率曲线在同一张图中可视化,无法判断合适的模型训练轮数。
请问作者如何判断模型训练恰到好处呢?
I would appreciate it if you could reply to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear author,hello.The pretrained model Voxel-MAE you proposed is very ingenious.I'm trying to replicate your work. 我做了两组实验: 实验1:SECOND训练20轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND20轮,后者效果显著好于前者。 实验2:SECOND训练200轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND200轮,前者效果好于后者。 考虑到训练过拟合,我又补充实验3:SECOND训练80轮,发现其在Car和骑行者的检测结果好于SECOND训练200轮,但是在行人检测上SECOND训练200轮效果更好。 我很疑惑,目前怀疑训练过拟合,但是我无法将loss曲线与eval准确率曲线在同一张图中可视化,无法判断合适的模型训练轮数。 请问作者如何判断模型训练恰到好处呢? I would appreciate it if you could reply to me.
Dear author,hello.The pretrained model Voxel-MAE you proposed is very ingenious.I'm trying to replicate your work.
我做了两组实验:
实验1:SECOND训练20轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND20轮,后者效果显著好于前者。
实验2:SECOND训练200轮,V-M训练20轮后再训练SECOND200轮,前者效果好于后者。
考虑到训练过拟合,我又补充实验3:SECOND训练80轮,发现其在Car和骑行者的检测结果好于SECOND训练200轮,但是在行人检测上SECOND训练200轮效果更好。
我很疑惑,目前怀疑训练过拟合,但是我无法将loss曲线与eval准确率曲线在同一张图中可视化,无法判断合适的模型训练轮数。
请问作者如何判断模型训练恰到好处呢?
I would appreciate it if you could reply to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: