(doc) ID cannot contain the word chocolatey

[pauby]

Description Of Changes

Adding a note to confirm that package ID's cannot contain the word chocolatey.

Motivation and Context

A package with the name chocolatey may give the impression that it is official and supported. While this is known, it's not documented.

Testing

• I have previewed these changes using the Docker Container or another method before submitting this pull request.

Change Types Made

• Minor documentation fix (typos etc.).
• Major documentation change (refactoring, reformatting or adding documentation to existing page).
• New documentation page added.
• The change I have made should have a video added, and I have raised an issue for this.
  • Issue #

Change Checklist

• Requires a change to menu structure (top or left hand side)/
• Menu structure has been updated

Related Issue

N/A

[JPRuskin]

I'm a little surprised we'd leave choco- available - it also feels pretty "official"... This is a sensible change, though.

[pauby]

We do require the title to day 'Unofficial' if choco is used. Maybe I should add that here too?

[gep13]

@pauby said...
Maybe I should add that here too?

Yes, I think that this would be a good addition as well.

[pauby]

@JPRuskin @gep13 I've added that now so this is ready for another review.

[JPRuskin]

LGTM!