-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add frequency + fallback value selector #1057
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5ab2ab7
Add frequency + fallback value selector
cprudhom fd543b6
Add contract on plugging restart in
cprudhom 2b04db5
Fix tests related to bf07cc720ec0c591ab7616bf6953b5c5c8936969
cprudhom 76d53c6
Replace frequency (int) by a Function<IntVar,Boolean>
cprudhom 521c4a3
Adapt test results to changes
cprudhom d171f58
Merge branch 'master' into dev_bivs
cprudhom 37f37a1
Restore default behavior of IntDomainBest, that is, to always applies it
cprudhom File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't we add the time ?
It should be compared with care but still it would be nice to have an idea if it is faster or slower
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, I won't add this for the reason described here (https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions/blog/why-github-actions-is-so-slow#what-hardware-is-actually-github-actions-using).
In two words, you cannot select the hardware the VM is running on.
This explains why Minizinc tests often fail on GH even though they work on my computer.
It's something I've been wanting to check for a long time now, but I can't find the right way to do it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that GitHub test runtime is hard to trust, but this file is updated locally (i.e. on your computer), no ?
Even if it is not perfect (various contributors may have several machines), it may be better than nothing...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Such artifact already exists. For instance, https://github.com/chocoteam/choco-solver/actions/runs/5766875782 you can get the artifact which contains 2 files, one for xcsp and the other for mzn
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the question should be: how to test performance regression?