Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine #64

dependabot · 2021-07-05T17:01:19Z

Bumps python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine.

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

@dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
@dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
@dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
@dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
@dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
@dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: python dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

jsf9k · 2021-07-07T18:48:15Z

The Docker images tagged with 3.9.6-alpine do not contain ppc64le or s390x builds, which I believe is why this build is failing. I'm not sure if that was an oversight on their part or a conscious decision. It does disagree with the documentation for the python Docker image.

jsf9k · 2021-07-09T15:40:00Z

The Docker images tagged with 3.9.6-alpine do not contain ppc64le or s390x builds, which I believe is why this build is failing. I'm not sure if that was an oversight on their part or a conscious decision. It does disagree with the documentation for the python Docker image.

Digging into this a bit more, I can see that there were some failures the last time these Docker images were built.

(I found the Jenkins page by going to the Docker Hub page for the owner of the python AMIs and clicking on the link for his or her homepage.)

I will wait for the next successful build for the 3.9.6-alpine3.14 tag before trying to re-run the GitHub Actions for this repository, unless @cisagov/team-ois has any other thoughts.

jsf9k · 2021-07-13T20:52:43Z

I will wait for the next successful build for the 3.9.6-alpine3.14 tag before trying to re-run the GitHub Actions for this repository, unless @cisagov/team-ois has any other thoughts.

The builds are still failing. The last successful builds for ppc64le and s390x are from June 25.

jsf9k · 2021-07-22T19:32:07Z

It looks like the ppc64le build is now passing, although it has not yet been pushed up to Docker Hub. Perhaps that will happen after all Docker images in the Jenkins link have built.

There is also a s390x build running now that I am following closely.

jsf9k · 2021-07-22T22:52:54Z

It looks like the ppc64le build is now passing, although it has not yet been pushed up to Docker Hub. Perhaps that will happen after all Docker images in the Jenkins link have built.

Confirmed that all the Docker images were built and the ppc64le Docker image was pushed up to Docker Hub.

jsf9k · 2021-07-25T02:04:58Z

@felddy, do we really care about supporting the discontinued-for-the-past-20+-years System/390 architecture? I'm inclined to dump support for now and add an issue to remind us to reintegrate it if it returns.

This makes it easier to temporarily drop support for a failing platform that we cannot fix, as we are currently experiencing with #64.

This makes it easier to temporarily drop support for a failing platform that we cannot fix, as we are currently experiencing with #64. Co-authored-by: Nick M <[email protected]>

jsf9k · 2021-07-25T18:28:27Z

@felddy, do we really care about supporting the discontinued-for-the-past-20+-years System/390 architecture? I'm inclined to dump support for now and add an issue to remind us to reintegrate it if it returns.

@felddy - See also #67, which provides a way to work around the failing platform.

jsf9k · 2021-08-03T16:44:54Z

@felddy, do we really care about supporting the discontinued-for-the-past-20+-years System/390 architecture? I'm inclined to dump support for now and add an issue to remind us to reintegrate it if it returns.

@felddy - See also #67, which provides a way to work around the failing platform.

@felddy - Bumping this comment in hopes of getting a response to the issue described in this PR.

dav3r · 2021-08-03T18:21:00Z

For what it's worth, I'm fully on board with dropping S/390 here and opening an issue to put it back later (if/when it works) if we really feel the need to do so.

felddy · 2021-08-05T14:50:31Z

@jsf9k Sorry for neglecting this PR.

I think you've got the correct approach figured out. Drop S/390x for now and add it back in if it returns / we need it.

Issue #69 has been created to remind us to re-add it once it is again supported by the official Python Docker image.

jsf9k

More specific base images are better.

dav3r

🐍

felddy · 2021-08-11T18:47:56Z

@felddy, do we really care about supporting the discontinued-for-the-past-20+-years System/390 architecture? I'm inclined to dump support for now and add an issue to remind us to reintegrate it if it returns.

We have learned that s390x is alive and well. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_on_IBM_Z

Historically the Linux kernel architecture designations were "s390" and "s390x" to distinguish between the 31-bit and 64-bit Linux on Z kernels respectively, but "s390" now also refers generally to the one Linux on Z kernel architecture.

These machines are still being produced today and should be supported. We need to think of the children. They should have the opportunity to Hack the Gibson.

mcdonnnj · 2021-08-11T19:33:05Z

@felddy, do we really care about supporting the discontinued-for-the-past-20+-years System/390 architecture? I'm inclined to dump support for now and add an issue to remind us to reintegrate it if it returns.

We have learned that s390x is alive and well. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_on_IBM_Z

Historically the Linux kernel architecture designations were "s390" and "s390x" to distinguish between the 31-bit and 64-bit Linux on Z kernels respectively, but "s390" now also refers generally to the one Linux on Z kernel architecture.

These machines are still being produced today and should be supported. We need to think of the children. They should have the opportunity to Hack the Gibson.

That's fair, but sadly you will need to go upstream to the Python Docker image maintainers to get them to figure out how to generate a functional s390x image 😛

This reverts commit 3ebf37d. There was finally a successful build of the official Python Docker image upstream, so we can add this back in. Resolves #69.

jsf9k · 2021-08-23T15:34:14Z

Great news! There was finally a clean build of the official Python Docker image for the s390x architecture, so we can add that back in.

Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine

52fb946

Bumps python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: python dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

dependabot bot requested review from dav3r, felddy, jsf9k and mcdonnnj as code owners July 5, 2021 17:01

dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file docker Pull requests that update Docker code labels Jul 5, 2021

jsf9k assigned jsf9k, dav3r and mcdonnnj Jul 7, 2021

jsf9k assigned felddy Jul 7, 2021

jsf9k force-pushed the dependabot/docker/python-3.9.6-alpine branch from 4c43079 to 52fb946 Compare July 7, 2021 18:23

jsf9k unassigned felddy and dav3r Jul 9, 2021

jsf9k added 2 commits July 22, 2021 18:52

Merge branch 'develop' into dependabot/docker/python-3.9.6-alpine

11c8ffe

Merge branch 'develop' into dependabot/docker/python-3.9.6-alpine

1aede48

jsf9k added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2021

Build Docker images for various platforms in a matrix strategy

a8a2e0d

This makes it easier to temporarily drop support for a failing platform that we cannot fix, as we are currently experiencing with #64.

jsf9k mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2021

Build Docker images for various platforms in a matrix strategy #67

Open

6 tasks

Remove support for the linux/s390x platform

3ebf37d

Issue #69 has been created to remind us to re-add it once it is again supported by the official Python Docker image.

jsf9k mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2021

Re-add support for the System/390 architecture when possible #69

Closed

jsf9k approved these changes Aug 5, 2021

View reviewed changes

dav3r approved these changes Aug 5, 2021

View reviewed changes

jsf9k added the blocked This issue or pull request is awaiting the outcome of another issue or pull request label Aug 5, 2021

Revert "Remove support for the linux/s390x platform"

a3825d8

This reverts commit 3ebf37d. There was finally a successful build of the official Python Docker image upstream, so we can add this back in. Resolves #69.

jsf9k linked an issue Aug 23, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request

Re-add support for the System/390 architecture when possible #69

Closed

Merge branch 'develop' into dependabot/docker/python-3.9.6-alpine

6888ba4

mcdonnnj merged commit f446490 into develop Aug 27, 2021

mcdonnnj deleted the dependabot/docker/python-3.9.6-alpine branch August 27, 2021 13:28

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine #64

Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine #64

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 5, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 7, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 9, 2021 •

edited

Loading

jsf9k commented Jul 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

jsf9k commented Jul 22, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 22, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 25, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 25, 2021

jsf9k commented Aug 3, 2021

dav3r commented Aug 3, 2021 •

edited

Loading

felddy commented Aug 5, 2021

jsf9k left a comment

dav3r left a comment

felddy commented Aug 11, 2021

mcdonnnj commented Aug 11, 2021

jsf9k commented Aug 23, 2021

Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine #64

Bump python from 3.9-alpine to 3.9.6-alpine #64

Conversation

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 5, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 7, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 9, 2021 • edited Loading

jsf9k commented Jul 13, 2021 • edited Loading

jsf9k commented Jul 22, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 22, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 25, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 25, 2021

jsf9k commented Aug 3, 2021

dav3r commented Aug 3, 2021 • edited Loading

felddy commented Aug 5, 2021

jsf9k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dav3r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

felddy commented Aug 11, 2021

mcdonnnj commented Aug 11, 2021

jsf9k commented Aug 23, 2021

jsf9k commented Jul 9, 2021 •

edited

Loading

jsf9k commented Jul 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

dav3r commented Aug 3, 2021 •

edited

Loading