Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin from 4.33.0 to 5.10.0 #585

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lholmquist
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the package-lock.json, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 661/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Uncontrolled resource consumption
SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 661/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728
Yes No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • 8894106 chore: publish v5.10.0
  • 5046882 fix(type-utils): intersection types involving readonly arrays are now handled in most cases (#4429)
  • 39a6806 fix(type-utils): isTypeReadonly now handles conditional types (#4421)
  • f4016c2 fix(eslint-plugin): [no-extra-semi] false negatives when used with eslint 8.3.0 (#4458)
  • 99ab193 fix(type-utils): union types always being marked as readonly (#4419)
  • ef3147c fix(type-utils): check IndexSignature internals when checking isTypeReadonly (#4417)
  • 3061ea9 chore: bump @ babel/types from 7.16.7 to 7.16.8 (#4454)
  • e56f1e5 fix(eslint-plugin): [no-invalid-this] crash when used with eslint 8.7.0 (#4448)
  • ba3d3a3 chore: bump eslint-plugin-jest from 25.3.4 to 25.7.0 (#4456)
  • 04cb5d8 chore: bump ts-jest from 27.1.2 to 27.1.3 (#4457)
  • d8e296d chore: bump webpack from 5.65.0 to 5.66.0 (#4455)
  • d053cde fix(eslint-plugin): [explicit-function-return-type] support AllowTypedFunctionExpression within AllowHigherOrderFunction (#4250)
  • 8a30108 chore: bump eslint-visitor-keys from 3.1.0 to 3.2.0 (#4452)
  • 377cbcf chore: bump rollup from 2.63.0 to 2.64.0 (#4450)
  • daf7990 chore: bump @ types/prettier from 2.4.2 to 2.4.3 (#4451)
  • 4cb46ff chore: bump downlevel-dts from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0 (#4447)
  • ff05dd8 test(type-utils): fix incorrect utils import (#4453)
  • 95aea18 refactor(eslint-plugin): [restrict-plus-operands] add better error messages (#4332)
  • ea85dda test(type-utils): add basic tests for isTypeReadonly (#4416)
  • c8e650f fix(eslint-plugin): [no-magic-numbers] handle bigint in class props (#4411)
  • 253bfa3 docs: fix typo in comment (#4445)
  • 4bda6ec chore: bump shelljs from 0.8.4 to 0.8.5 (#4442)
  • 9eb0a5b chore: bump follow-redirects from 1.14.5 to 1.14.7 (#4437)
  • 1d55a75 feat: rename `experimental-utils` to `utils` and make `experimental-utils` an alias to the new package (#4172)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled resource consumption

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants