Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating the L1TrackObjectNtupleMaker with genJet information and using the SimVertex collection (Master) #45422

Conversation

BenjaminRS
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR resolves the issue reported here: cms-l1t-offline#1097
Namely it fixes the generator level vertex to use the SimVertex collection (from Geant4 SimHits).

PR validation:

This PR passes the following checks:


  • scram b
  • scram b code-format
  • scram b code-checks
  • time cmsRun L1Trigger/L1TTrackMatch/test/L1TrackObjectNtupleMaker_cfg.py

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR is a port of cms-l1t-offline#1252 to the L1T offline branch

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 10, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @BenjaminRS for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/L1TTrackMatch (l1, upgrade)
  • L1Trigger/VertexFinder (l1)

@aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
# Track word limits (256 binns): [-20.46912512, 20.46912512, 0.15991504]
FH_HistogramParameters = cms.vdouble(-20.46912512, 20.46912512, 0.15991504),
# The number of vertixes to return (i.e. N windows with the highest combined pT)
FH_NVtx = cms.uint32(10),
FH_NVtx = cms.uint32(1),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to note that this should really be 1 in order to follow what the FW will do.

@epalencia
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-71f1cd/40327/summary.html
COMMIT: 56bb031
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-07-09-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45422/40327/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 8 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3345094
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3345068
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@epalencia
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2b3bc29 into cms-sw:master Jul 15, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants