-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VXBS For High Pt #46287
VXBS For High Pt #46287
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46287/42109
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rbhattacharya04 for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable nano |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
instead of muonBestTrack, which was a mistake
There was an error. The covariance matrix should have been read form tunePMuonBestTrack. At the first commit, it was read from muonBestTrack. At this commit now, this error is fixed, now it is read from tunePMuonBestTrack. |
There was a suggestion just yesterday to add the tuneP_charge in the NanoAODs. So, I have done another commit just adding the tuneP_charge. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46287/42365
|
Pull request #46287 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
please abort |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This pull request contains
3 elements of the VXBS covariance matrix as 3 different float variables
error on the dxyBS
For Muon. From the discussion we had at the Muon POG, these variables will be enough for implementing VXBS constraint on any kind of muon track.
The error on dxyBS looks similar enough with the error on dxy, which you can see in the attached plot. In the plot the blue curve is error on dxy and red one is error on dxyBS. So if everyone agrees we can drop the error on dxyBs.
dxybsErr_data.pdf