Add documentation website

[guidemetothemoon]

What type of PR is this?

kind/documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Moved documentation for the Green Reviews WG into a dedicated website, based on Doks theme for Hugo that will be deployed and hosted by Netlify.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #65

Special notes for your reviewer (optional):

• Removed docs folder.
• Moved documentation to website/content/docs.
• Deployed website Doks theme, as per official documentation with enabled search and website light/dark theme toggle.
• Updated default configuration where applicable to adapt to our use case. Some of default configuration is kept in case we want to utilize it in the future.
• Added configuration for deployment via Netlify.
• Updated README.md in the root of the repository with information on the website, how to update documentation and how to run the website locally.

Disclaimer: I haven't gone in-depth through the content of the documentation itselft. I believe that it will be improved continuously. Versioning of the documentation is currently not enabled, but it is possible to do in case we want it.

Fun fact: authors behind the theme care about environmental impact, which is also visible in the documentation: https://getdoks.org/docs/start-here/environmental-impact

[guidemetothemoon]

@leonardpahlke we need help with setting up deployment site in Netlify and getting the domain ready. I've configured it in the source code so it should work, but I don't have access to the CNCF Netlify to actually test this. Local testing was performed and it all looks good. Who can help us with getting this part in place?🙌
(We may also want to do it after this PR is merged to master)

[leonardpahlke]

@leonardpahlke we need help with setting up deployment site in Netlify and getting the domain ready.

opened a servicedesk ticket 👍

[leonardpahlke]

LGTM

[leonardpahlke]

PTAL @nikimanoledaki / @AntonioDiTuri / @rossf7

[rossf7]

LGTM

[nikimanoledaki]

@guidemetothemoon would it be possible to revert this? 🥺 🥲

[guidemetothemoon]

@nikimanoledaki sure, I can revert it. Where should the docs be now? Should I just revert exactly to the way it was or shall we move it out/modify the folder structure as well?

[nikimanoledaki]

Yes, let's revert this at first, since it won't be served. 🙁 The dir structure makes the docs a bit difficult to read unfortunately too. I'm trying to link people to them (a good thing!!) 🙈 😄

[nikimanoledaki]

And then we can look for a way to point to this repo's dir from the TAG repo - I'm sure there's a way. Could open a new issue and see if anyone would like to contribute this! Otherwise I could look into it at some point

[leonardpahlke]

Could we move the documentation to the tag-env-sustainability repository, as discussed in #65. As mentioned in #65 (comment) if we split websites & repositories it makes things more complicated for no good reason.

[guidemetothemoon]

@nikimanoledaki reverted PR #94

[nikimanoledaki]

Thank you @guidemetothemoon 💚

@leonardpahlke yeah, I'm considering our options for how we should do that. Let's discuss this in issue #65! 😊