Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update codemod readmes #379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged

Update codemod readmes #379

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

mohab-sameh
Copy link
Contributor

@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh commented Apr 22, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

Fixes codemod package READMEs

@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
codemod ❌ Failed (Inspect) Apr 22, 2024 2:58pm
studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 22, 2024 2:58pm

fix bull readmes

fix mui readmes

fix redwood readmes

fix netlify sdk readmes

fix ember readmes

fix biome readme

fix jest to vitest readme

Update .codemodrc.json

fix mocha readmes

fix msw readmes

Update .codemodrc.json

fix next i18n readme

Update README.md

fix react router readmes

fix typescript codemod readmes

fix react codemod readmes

fix cal readmes

update codemod readmes
@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh force-pushed the update-codemod-readmes branch from 45c3054 to b7318b9 Compare April 22, 2024 14:53
@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2024 14:56
@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh requested review from r4zendev and hbjORbj April 22, 2024 14:56
@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh merged commit bbfa75f into main Apr 22, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@mohab-sameh mohab-sameh deleted the update-codemod-readmes branch April 22, 2024 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants