Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase Konflux large tier pvc to 180 #1016

Merged

Conversation

hugares
Copy link
Contributor

@hugares hugares commented Apr 24, 2024

KFLUXBUGS-1235

Signed-off-by: Hugo Arès <[email protected]>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Hi @hugares. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a codeready-toolchain member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

hugares added a commit to hugares/toolchain-e2e that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexeykazakov, hugares

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@alexeykazakov
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@alexeykazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like it failed because of the flaky test for SBR (not related to this PR).

/retest

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.57%. Comparing base (d1e027d) to head (d74e9e3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1016   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.57%   84.57%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        4844     4844           
=======================================
  Hits         4097     4097           
  Misses        574      574           
  Partials      173      173           

@alexeykazakov alexeykazakov merged commit 76b358d into codeready-toolchain:master Apr 25, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
alexeykazakov added a commit to codeready-toolchain/toolchain-e2e that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
Paired with codeready-toolchain/host-operator#1016

KFLUXBUGS-1235

Signed-off-by: Hugo Arès <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexey Kazakov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants