Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added option to disable stack protection for SQLiteCpp #8434

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2021
Merged

Added option to disable stack protection for SQLiteCpp #8434

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2021

Conversation

maximiliank
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliank maximiliank commented Dec 14, 2021

Specify library name and version: SQLiteCpp/3.1.1

Using MinGW on Windows it is required to disable stack protection for SQLiteCpp. It is supported by the CMake variable SQLITECPP_USE_STACK_PROTECTION, see SRombauts/SQLiteCpp#286


  • I've read the guidelines for contributing.
  • I've followed the PEP8 style guides for Python code in the recipes.
  • I've used the latest Conan client version.
  • I've tried at least one configuration locally with the conan-center hook activated.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 14, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

All green in build 2 (53281d1c7e4b1402439ffb2c134b9e20b0c81601):

  • sqlitecpp/2.4.0@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • sqlitecpp/2.5.0@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • sqlitecpp/3.1.1@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

@SSE4 SSE4 requested a review from uilianries December 18, 2021 06:25
Copy link
Member

@uilianries uilianries left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@conan-center-bot conan-center-bot merged commit 3cf049e into conan-io:master Dec 20, 2021
miklelappo pushed a commit to miklelappo/conan-center-index that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants