Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create profanity filter workflow and accompanying label #883

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

beeankha
Copy link
Member

Description

Due to a recent incident involving a community member posting a conda issue that included profanity (in violation of CoC guidelines), it appears that there might be some good use for including a profanity filter across the conda GH org.

@beeankha beeankha added the type::task indicates a change that doesn't pertain to the code itself, e.g. updating CI/CQ, rebuilding package label Feb 29, 2024
@beeankha beeankha self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@conda-bot conda-bot added the cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA label Feb 29, 2024
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
- name: dependencies
description: '[bot] PRs that update a dependency file'
color: '#0366d6'
- name: profane content 🤬
description: 'Either the title or body text contains profanity'
color: 'FBCA04'
Copy link
Member Author

@beeankha beeankha Feb 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This label is required (if not previously implemented a new one gets created), please see Label requirements section of the profanity filter's README

@beeankha beeankha marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 22:42
@beeankha beeankha requested a review from a team as a code owner February 29, 2024 22:42
@beeankha beeankha added the pending::discussion contains some ongoing discussion that needs to be resolved prior to proceeding label Mar 7, 2024
@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented Jul 31, 2024

@beeankha Following the discussion in March about this, could you provide an update on this please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA pending::discussion contains some ongoing discussion that needs to be resolved prior to proceeding type::task indicates a change that doesn't pertain to the code itself, e.g. updating CI/CQ, rebuilding package
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants