Add ARCADE dataset #258
Draft
Add ARCADE dataset #258
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I can't seem to figure out another issue: the image label pairs seem to have a mismatch (not for all images though). I'll investigate this later at some point. I'll leave this open for now! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a dataset for coronary artery segmentation from the ARCADE challenge.
@constantinpape,
The extraction of annotations using pycocotools works as expected for most of the images, except a very few, where it generates annotations from a very different "image_id". I couldn't find the reason why it happens for only handful of images, and not for all the images. (I left the code block in there for now and left some comments on my observation to debug the issue)
For now, I went ahead with the extraction method provided by the challenge organizers, and it works as expected.
If you have time and you spot the cause of the above mentioned ambiguity, let me know. (ideally, would be nice to stick to using pycocotools as the standard for such conversions) Thanks!
PS. The data download is <500MB.