Add optional method field for describing the technique used to verify account/URI control
#203
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…fy account/URI control
christianpaquin
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
talltree
reviewed
Dec 16, 2024
talltree
reviewed
Dec 16, 2024
Brianthered
reviewed
Dec 17, 2024
docs/modules/ROOT/pages/index.adoc
Outdated
| | `cawg.file_verification` | The _<<_identity_provider,identity provider>>_ verified control over a specific URI by providing unique file content which could subsequently be read from that URI. | link:https://docs.digicert.com/en/certcentral/manage-certificates/supported-dcv-methods-for-validating-the-domains-on-ov-ev-tls-ssl-certificate-orders/use-the-http-practical-demonstration-validation-method-to-verify-domain-control.html[Use the HTTP Practical Demonstration DCV method to verify domain control (Digicert)] | ||
| | `cawg.email` | The _<<_identity_provider,identity provider>>_ verified control over a specific domain using an e-mail sent to the domain’s administrative contacts. | link:++https://docs.digicert.com/en/certcentral/manage-certificates/supported-dcv-methods-for-validating-the-domains-on-ov-ev-tls-ssl-certificate-orders/use-the-email-dcv-method-to-verify-domain-control.html++[Use Email verification to verify domain control on an OV or EV TLS certificate (Digicert)] | ||
| | `cawg.meta_tag` | The _<<_identity_provider,identity provider>>_ verified control over a specific URI by providing unique content to be placed in an HTML `<meta>` tag. | link:https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9008080?visit_id=638690062950474628-2219554616&rd=1#meta_tag_verification&zippy=%2Chtml-tag[Verification method details: HTML tag (Google Support)] | ||
| | `cawg.oath2` | The _<<_identity_provider,identity provider>>_ verified control over a specific account or resource using link:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749[OAuth2]. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if you want to add a cawg.webauthn? It feels like, once it hits broader adoption, it will be a more direct confirmation of identity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's discuss in CAWG meeting. I'm not very familiar with WebAuthn.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #202.