Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow timescale to be a non-primary rails db #58

Conversation

segiddins
Copy link
Contributor

Enables rubygems.org to use timescale as a secondary db only for gem downloads: rubygems/rfcs#48

Consumed in rubygems/rubygems.org#3560

@segiddins segiddins marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2023 01:54
@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins Thank you so much for your contribution, it's awesome to hear that rubygems will use the gem 🚀

@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the segiddins/support-for-timescale-in-other-database branch from 758fdee to 14432de Compare April 4, 2023 18:10
@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins One last thing, could you follow conventional commits specs -> https://github.com/crunchloop/timescaledb-rails/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests?

@segiddins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@santiagodoldan feel free to change the commit message when squash-merging

@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins Sure, that works too, let me know about my last 2 comments and I will approve your PR when they are done, I'll push a new version to rubygems if everything works as expected 🚀

@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins Hey, let me know if my comments make sense to you, so I can resolve them and merge your changes 🚀

@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins Looks like ruby2_keywords was introduced in ruby 2.7

@santiagodoldan santiagodoldan merged commit 54775e7 into crunchloop:main Apr 19, 2023
@santiagodoldan
Copy link
Contributor

@segiddins Thanks for your contribution 💯

@segiddins segiddins deleted the segiddins/support-for-timescale-in-other-database branch April 19, 2023 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants