-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stats calc tool #2628
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Stats calc tool #2628
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2 similar comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
), | ||
).tag(config=True) | ||
|
||
dl1a_column_name = CaselessStrEnum( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is DL1a/b is "official"? Also, I'd perhaps use generic input_column_name
similar to the output one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, in ctapipe we use DL1_IMAGES
and DL1_PARAMETERS
to distinguish between things that are per-pixel vs. single quantities per event.
https://ctapipe.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/ctapipe.io.DataLevel.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd also not make this an enum. In the generic tool, users should be able to chose any column that has compatible shape. Just provide a clear error when the column is not found in the input file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could also be a list of columns, to compute on multiple at the same time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I changed the column name and also polish the references to DL1a data by using pixel-wise image data which is more descriptive. ToolConfigurationError
is raised once the column is not found. Having list of columns seems a little bit of an overkill here, which would just make the code more complex. Maybe the aggregation config could be shared between the columns, but especially the outlier detection will be different between the columns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ToolConfigurationError is raised once the column is not found. Having list of columns seems a little bit of an overkill here, which would just make the code more complex. Maybe the aggregation config could be shared between the columns, but especially the outlier detection will be different between the columns.
I think the case where you only want to know about a single column is quite rare, you are usually interested in multiple. So having to read all data again to compute metrics on a new column seems very limiting and a loop over columns shouldn't make the code much more complex.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently fails to read prod3 files (which have no EFFECTIVE focal length information). The tool current fails with a focal_length_choice
exception, however it seems there is no way to set the focal length choioce since the TableLoader
is not set up to be configrable.
prod 5 files should have effective focal length |
# Iterate over the telescope ids and calculate the statistics | ||
for tel_id in self.tel_ids: | ||
# Read the whole dl1 images for one particular telescope | ||
dl1_table = self.input_data.read_telescope_events_by_id( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get a crash here:
% ctapipe-calculate-pixel-statistics -i events.dl1.h5 -o stats.h5
dl1_table = self.input_data.read_telescope_events_by_id(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/io/tableloader.py", line 1089, in read_telescope_events_by_id
tel_ids = self.subarray.get_tel_ids(telescopes)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/instrument/subarray.py", line 549, in get_tel_ids
for telescope in telescopes:
TypeError: 'numpy.int16' object is not iterable
Seems to be due to passing an integer instead of a list, which is what is required by read_telescope_events_by_id
dl1_table = self.input_data.read_telescope_events_by_id( | |
dl1_table = self.input_data.read_telescope_events_by_id( | |
telescopes = [tel_id,] |
How does this work in the tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point! I do not know why the test pass here. I will include the change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A more general comment: with very minor changes, this could be turned into ctapipe-calculate-stats
, i.e. the ability to compute stats for any column, not just pixel-wise ones.
- Expose TableLoader as a configurable component (needed anyhow, see above)
- minor modifications to drop assumption on data shape in
calculator.py
.
I would expect e.g. to be able to do:
ctapipe-calculate-pixel-statistics -i events-prod5.DL1.h5
--StatisticsAggregator.chunk_size=100
--StatisticsCalculatorTool.input_column_name hillas_length
-o length.h5
and get the stats on the length parameter. This is perhaps outside the scope of this PR, but should be kept in mind. It also relates to @maxnoe's comment that we could change the API to accept a mapping of columns to Aggragators.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A common error is to have too small a chunk size, but this now results in a very ugly error and a full trace-back and exception, along with an UnclosedFileWarning
(bug?)
- The former (Unexpected exception) should e caught and raises as a
ToolConfigurationError
, so the user gets a nice message. And please explain in the message what parameters controls this, i.e. sayChange --StatisticsAggregator.chunk_size to decrease this
. - The latter (unclosed file) seems to be a bug to fix.
2024-11-06 15:14:43,361 ERROR [ctapipe.StatisticsCalculatorTool] (tool.run): Caught unexpected exception: The length of the provided table (853) is insufficient to meet the required statistics for a single chunk of size (2500).
2024-11-06 15:14:43,361 ERROR [ctapipe.StatisticsCalculatorTool] (tool.run): Caught unexpected exception: The length of the provided table (853) is insufficient to meet the required statistics for a single chunk of size (2500).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/core/tool.py", line 431, in run
self.start()
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/tools/calculate_pixel_stats.py", line 134, in start
aggregated_stats = self.stats_calculator.first_pass(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/monitoring/calculator.py", line 169, in first_pass
aggregated_stats = aggregator(
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/Working/ctapipe/src/ctapipe/monitoring/aggregator.py", line 86, in __call__
raise ValueError(
ValueError: The length of the provided table (853) is insufficient to meet the required statistics for a single chunk of size (2500).
2024-11-06 15:14:43,377 INFO [ctapipe.StatisticsCalculatorTool] (tool.write_provenance): Output:
/Users/kkosack/miniconda3/envs/ctapipe-0.21/lib/python3.12/site-packages/tables/file.py:113: UnclosedFileWarning: Closing remaining open file: /Users/kkosack/Projects/CTA/PipeWork/v0.21.3/events-prod5.DL1.h5
warnings.warn(UnclosedFileWarning(msg))
@@ -100,3 +100,18 @@ def test_tool_config_error(tmp_path, dl1_image_file): | |||
cwd=tmp_path, | |||
raises=True, | |||
) | |||
# Check if ToolConfigurationError is raised | |||
# when the chunk size is larger than the number of events in the input file | |||
with pytest.raises(ToolConfigurationError): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the tool will raise ToolConfigurationError
in a few situations. Please test all of them and use regexp matching to check whether a correct error message is displayed, e.g.
with pytest.raises(ToolConfigurationError): | |
with pytest.raises(ToolConfigurationError, match="Change --StatisticsAggregator.chunk_size")): | |
... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Actually, I found that the first raise pytest wasn't raised on the 'column' check but on the 'chunk_size' check which comes before in the tool.
) | ||
# Add metadata to the aggregated statistics | ||
aggregated_stats.meta["input_url"] = self.input_data.input_url | ||
aggregated_stats.meta["input_column_name"] = self.input_column_name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd not add this as input_column_name
but as prefix for the columns. Using prefixes you can also aggregate multiple columns easily.
See e.g. how we write tables in ctapipe-apply-models
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@maxnoe , we discussed this with @TjarkMiener offline and we don't see much use cases for this. Also, having the metadata as a prefix for the column name can make queries awkward and schemas inflexible (i.e. set of aggregators will be fixed for each input source). Also, in this case, something like pandas.MultiIndex will be more appropriate in my opinion, but again, I don't see much use. I'd leave this as is for the moment, and modify if a corresponding use case appears.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The usecase is consistency with what we doe elsewhere and loading such data with e.g.TableLoader
.
I.e. my use case would be to load these data and look add aggregated statistics for multiple columns.
This has to match waht e.g. is planned for quality pipe, right? Aggregating high-level information for many of the data columns and other things and loading them at the same time, producing control plots etc.
But fine to do in a follow up PR.
I really don't like the limitation to a single column though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me what you want sounds like a pandas.MultiIndex, which is not supported in the current way of astropy, and I'm not sure whether it will ever be supported like that... Also, aggregating (flattening) and joining can be done elsewhere (e.g. when QualPipe reads it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant that independent of the columns names / data organization I don't like that this tool can only aggregate a single column, and that using it for multiple requires separate runs of the tool with separate output files, performing the expensive data loading again and again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tool is not only aggregating stats, but also detecting outliers and treating regions of trouble properly. Each column requires a distinct set of configuration parameters. Therefore, I think it is inevitable to perform separate runs of the tool, which are independent on each other.
tel_id, | ||
) | ||
# Add metadata to the aggregated statistics | ||
aggregated_stats.meta["input_url"] = self.input_data.input_url |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add source event type to the metadata, so we know whether this is calculated from FF, pedestal, or some other type of events.
Since we should also support the processing of MCs, we might want to run the stats calc tool over multiple tels.
rename the tool and file name only keep dl1 table of the particular telescope into RAM added tests for tool config errors rename input col name adopt yaml syntax in example config for stats calculation
renamed output_column_name to output_table_name
07587ad
to
b0c197c
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
remove the input url since it is irrelevant
Analysis Details0 IssuesCoverage and DuplicationsProject ID: cta-observatory_ctapipe_AY52EYhuvuGcMFidNyUs |
Code updated, please take a second look.
This PR adds a generic stats-calculation tool utilizing the
PixelStatisticsCalculator
.Related #2542