-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make --version and --help commands work without a project #115
Open
diogofferreira
wants to merge
3
commits into
cudos-dev
Choose a base branch
from
make-version-and-help-work-without-project
base: cudos-dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, removing the
getConfig
alone is sufficient! Any command which requiresblast.config.js
also callsgetConfig
itself. (getConfig
doesn't store the config it loads anywhere, it just returns it. So anything which actually wants the config must call it again.)It looks like
getConfig
is only called here to make blast fail immediately if there isn't a config, but it will always fail later if a command tries to actually use the config.As it stands, putting
getConfig
inside a try block is actually the same as not doing it, because the only effectgetConfig
has here is to throw an immediately ignored exception if the config isn't there, and do nothing if it is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is true for everything but the custom task command. Custom tasks were implemented in a different way from all other commands, with no entry points nor config loading (even though it needs it). The getConfig on main was in fact the only way custom tasks were getting the config, and simply transferring it to the task class won't work (at least with no exception handling or refactoring), as it will trigger a "config file now found" exception when out of a project folder.