Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve citation ordering #7

Open
taiya opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Improve citation ordering #7

taiya opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@taiya
Copy link
Collaborator

taiya commented Jun 13, 2023

Removed this comment from end of \subsection{Miscellaneous} subsection of the author-kit, and converted it into an issue

% Update the cvpr.cls to do the following automatically.
% For this citation style, keep multiple citations in numerical (not
% chronological) order, so prefer \cite{Alpher03,Alpher02,Authors14} to
% \cite{Alpher02,Alpher03,Authors14}.
@adinriv
Copy link
Collaborator

adinriv commented Jun 14, 2023

The order of the bibliography depends on the style we use. If we want to use order in appearance vs. chronological, for example. We could use IEEEtranN for the unsorted and with natbib support.

I prefer to have the group of citations sorted, since it helps checking the group. And with the numerical styles have them in order of appearance. But that is a style preference.

Regarding the support for the bibliography and citations, we should consider porting the whole system to biblatex instead of bibtex as well. But that is better for another issue.

@taiya
Copy link
Collaborator Author

taiya commented Jun 14, 2023

I think biblatex we can do for next year.
Looks to be a larger change which requires much more work.
(configuring all the options to have style parity)

I had started, but was taking me too long.

@taiya
Copy link
Collaborator Author

taiya commented Jul 6, 2023

@sroth-visinf to comment on this.

@sroth-visinf
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree with @Tayia here. I had also wanted to switch to BibLaTeX already in 2022, but adjusting the formatting of the entries so that they conform to the usual style proved rather tedious. I had started but found that there are loads of corner cases. Plus this needs to be thoroughly tested before it is rolled out. CVPR/ICCV/etc. program chairs cannot possibly provide LaTeX support to sort out people's issues. Aiming to do this next year with sufficient lead time is probably best.

@adinriv
Copy link
Collaborator

adinriv commented Jul 10, 2023

If you can provide a list of the test entries, I can work on them (depending on how troublesome they are to iron out).

Also, since the base biblatex style comes from IEEE, my guess is that it should be less problematic unless there have been style choices made along the way.

In the attempt to port (#10) you can see what has been ported and how it is working so far.

@taiya taiya added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants