Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Biblatex port #10

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Biblatex port #10

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

adinriv
Copy link
Collaborator

@adinriv adinriv commented Jun 15, 2023

This is an attempt to port the template to use biblatex (and biber) as default reference setup. This will solve the comments on #7.

The setup uses the default IEEE bibliography style which should be compatible with CVPR (as far as I know). Check if there are inconsistencies or other changes that may be needed, and report them back.

I left the parenthesis on the backref page list used in the standard style since it makes it cleaner than a list of numbers after the reference.

The first names are abbreviated to save space, but that can be removed if needed.

@taiya
Copy link
Collaborator

taiya commented Jun 20, 2023

Can you do a before/after comparison of the rendered PDF? tx

@adinriv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adinriv commented Jun 21, 2023

This is the style on the main branch:
Screenshot from 2023-06-21 10-37-54

And this is the style in the merge request:
Screenshot from 2023-06-21 10-40-07
Notice that the names are abbreviated. However, they can be typeset and it will look like
Screenshot from 2023-06-21 10-40-17

A short note: There is one main difference between this CVPR style and the IEEE one on the article style. In particular the volume-number-eid part in the reference is different. I'm not sure when it was changed, but it may be good to check if another style is better. E.g., the default IEEE style.

@taiya
Copy link
Collaborator

taiya commented Sep 11, 2024

@adinriv as this was a major (potentially breaking) change, we decided to dry-run it (privately, without affecting 100k people) for CVPR 2025, and include it in the edits for next year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants