Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optional output extension #634

Closed

Conversation

oliver-sanders
Copy link
Member

Sibling: cylc/cylc-flow#5651

Document the changes outlined in
https://cylc.github.io/cylc-admin/proposal-optional-output-extension.html

Requirements check-list

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md and added my name as a Code Contributor.

@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders added the content Addition or modification of documentation label Jul 31, 2023
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders added this to the 8.3.0 milestone Jul 31, 2023
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders self-assigned this Jul 31, 2023
@@ -1489,7 +1493,6 @@ Glossary


required output
expected output
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Term "expected output" never used elsewhere, simpler to remove this unused term and stick to "required".

Comment on lines +137 to +139
:cylc-flow: `8.2 <https://github.com/cylc/cylc-flow/blob/8.2.x/CHANGES.md>`__
:cylc-uiserver: `1.3 <https://github.com/cylc/cylc-uiserver/blob/1.3.x/CHANGES.md>`__
:cylc-rose: `1.3 <https://github.com/cylc/cylc-rose/blob/1.3.x/CHANGES.md>`__
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should have been set to tagged milestones at release.

@MetRonnie
Copy link
Member

As cylc/cylc-flow#5651 has been closed, so should this? Reopen if not

@MetRonnie MetRonnie closed this Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Addition or modification of documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants