Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Context to allow cloud to sort filter values #17084

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

salazarm
Copy link
Contributor

@salazarm salazarm commented Oct 9, 2023

Summary & Motivation

This is a pretty generic way for cloud to sort filter values. It allows Cloud to specify a sorting function for a filter by it's name.
This means that multiple filters with the same name could be targeted by cloud and this is intentional. The thinking behind it is that you might have a "User" filter in many parts of the app and we would very likely want cloud to target all of them instead of just a specific one.

@salazarm salazarm requested review from bengotow and hellendag October 9, 2023 13:09
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Deploy preview for dagit-core-storybook ready!

✅ Preview
https://dagit-core-storybook-8dytu89kx-elementl.vercel.app
https://salazarm-hook-for-cloud.core-storybook.dagster-docs.io

Built with commit a8fb532.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

@salazarm salazarm changed the title [RFC} Context to allow cloud to sort filter values [RFC] Context to allow cloud to sort filter values Oct 9, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@bengotow bengotow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems fine to me!

@salazarm salazarm merged commit 9f9f3fc into master Oct 9, 2023
@salazarm salazarm deleted the salazarm/hook-for-cloud branch October 9, 2023 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants