[dagster-u] - Fix typos and some code examples #18539
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tacastillo
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2023
zyd14
pushed a commit
to zyd14/dagster
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2024
## Summary & Motivation This PR fixes a few small issues in Dagster Essentials that a student pointed out: - Addresses a typo - Updates some awkward phrasing - Updates answer code to correctly use a variable in `constants` instead of a hard-coded path - Removes and extra new line from answer code imports ## How I Tested These Changes 👀 , ran locally
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary & Motivation
This PR fixes a few small issues in Dagster Essentials that a student pointed out:
constantsinstead of a hard-coded pathHow I Tested These Changes
👀 , ran locally