Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ui] Clean up Auto-materialize references #23477

Conversation

hellendag
Copy link
Member

@hellendag hellendag commented Aug 7, 2024

Summary & Motivation

Remove some existing references to "Auto-materialize" and replace some others with information about Declarative Automation.

How I Tested These Changes

TS, lint.

Copy link
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @hellendag and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@hellendag hellendag marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2024 16:57
/>
</Box>
);
};
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I guess I should leave this in place and update the copy, is that right? @OwenKephart

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Deploy preview for dagit-core-storybook ready!

✅ Preview
https://dagit-core-storybook-blucvhr6f-elementl.vercel.app
https://dish-fe-493-remove-update-automaterialize-references-in-the-ui.core-storybook.dagster-docs.io

Built with commit 5951ea6.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

@hellendag hellendag force-pushed the dish/fe-493-remove-update-automaterialize-references-in-the-ui branch from bbbb1e1 to 5951ea6 Compare August 8, 2024 20:48
@hellendag hellendag merged commit 3d11bf1 into master Aug 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@hellendag hellendag deleted the dish/fe-493-remove-update-automaterialize-references-in-the-ui branch August 8, 2024 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants