Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

followup to "replace GrapheneAssetNode isSource with isMaterializable" #23490

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sryza
Copy link
Contributor

@sryza sryza commented Aug 7, 2024

Summary & Motivation

I accidentally merged #23401 before fixing the bugs that @bengotow noticed. Here's a quick followup to fix.

How I Tested These Changes

@sryza sryza requested a review from bengotow August 7, 2024 21:04
@sryza sryza changed the title followup to replace GrapheneAssetNode isSource with isMaterializable followup to "replace GrapheneAssetNode isSource with isMaterializable" Aug 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Deploy preview for dagit-core-storybook ready!

✅ Preview
https://dagit-core-storybook-pudkqige6-elementl.vercel.app
https://is-source-after-fix.core-storybook.dagster-docs.io

Built with commit 2b763db.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

@sryza sryza requested a review from salazarm August 8, 2024 18:20
@sryza sryza force-pushed the is-source-after-fix branch from c7d70f0 to 2b763db Compare August 8, 2024 21:24
@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Aug 8, 2024

Actually – thinking about this more deeply after noticing a test failure, I think the expected behavior is actually that we do want to hide the tab if the definition does not exist. So I'm going to close this without merging.

@sryza sryza closed this Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants