View Column persist_docs + functional tests #519
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benc-db
requested review from
andrefurlan-db,
susodapop and
rcypher-databricks
as code owners
benc-db
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #
Description
As part of switching over to functional tests, I discovered that we never did get view column comments to work because we weren't inheriting the change I pushed for in dbt-spark. This PR rectifies that along with the test change. I'm contemplating what to do about the integration test since we hard code to not do column comments except for delta/hudi. Do we actually know it wouldn't work for iceberg/parquet?
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdand added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.