Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dbt codegen only manually handles limited sets of Databricks types #875

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

dbt codegen only manually handles limited sets of Databricks types #875

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
+3 −0

Conversation

benc-db
Copy link
Collaborator

@benc-db benc-db commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Resolves #873

Description

To keep dbt codegen from falling over, we need to include types that might be found in information_schema in the DatabricksRelationType enum.

Checklist

  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md and added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.

@benc-db benc-db merged commit 40925aa into main Dec 11, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jackyhu-db jackyhu-db jackyhu-db approved these changes

@andrefurlan-db andrefurlan-db Awaiting requested review from andrefurlan-db andrefurlan-db is a code owner

@rcypher-databricks rcypher-databricks Awaiting requested review from rcypher-databricks rcypher-databricks is a code owner

@alexguo-db alexguo-db Awaiting requested review from alexguo-db

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error with table type 'managed_shallow_clone' when running codegen
2 participants
@benc-db @jackyhu-db