Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various minor fixes to the Definition of DONE #328

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mustafaokyay
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

* I proofread my tutorial:
1. Are the steps available and in the correct order?
1. Are there any spelling mistakes?
1. Does everything make sense?
* I ran through the latest update of my tutorial in Katacoda-Dev and checked if everything was working as intended BEFORE requesting a review.

# **Technical**
* The files that were used in `nextKatacodaStep `are available in `.asciidoc` files and do not contain Katacoda Syntax. `nextKatacodaStep` is almost never needed.
* The files that were used in `nextKatacodaStep `are available in `.asciidoc` files and do not contain Katacoda Syntax.
* The name of the function `nextKatacodaStep ` has been changed to make it clearer that there is no functional content allowed. Now it is called `displayContent `
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't you just use the name displayContent. I think it is a bit confusing when you first mention nextKatacodaStep and then displayContent. We should remove nextKatacodaStep as it is not used anymore.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mustafaokyay mustafaokyay Sep 22, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GuentherJulian Then I guess I should remove the entire sentence , as the sole purpose of mentioning nextKatacodaStep here was to remind the tutorial-makers to not use it. But it was renamed entirely so we do not need to mention it at all.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, just mention displayContent and that no Katacoda syntax should be used inside files used in this step

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants