Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dustmite/polyhash.d: Surround gcc assembly operands in parentheses #468

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

the-horo
Copy link

Compiling with recent versions of gdc results in errors:

DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-289:293:13: error: ‘low’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-289:293:23: error: ‘high’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-289:294:12: error: ‘a’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-289:294:20: error: ‘b’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d:165:37: error: template instance ‘polyhash.longMul!ulong’ error instantiating
  165 |                 this.value = longMul(this.value, operand.value).longDiv(q).remainder;
      |                                     ^
DustMite/polyhash.d:32:35: note: instantiated from here: ‘opOpAssign!"*"’
   32 |                                 v *= v;
      |                                   ^
DustMite/splitter.d:50:28: note: instantiated from here: ‘PolynomialHash!(ModQ!(ulong, 18446744073709551557LU))’
   50 |         alias EntityHash = PolynomialHash!(ModQ!(ulong, largest64bitPrime));
      |                            ^
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-362:366:13: error: ‘quotient’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-362:366:28: error: ‘remainder’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-362:367:12: error: ‘low’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-362:367:21: error: ‘high’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d-mixin-362:367:32: error: ‘b’ must be surrounded by parentheses
DustMite/polyhash.d:165:72: error: template instance ‘polyhash.longDiv!(ulong, LongInt!(64u, false))’ error instantiating
  165 |                this.value = longMul(this.value, operand.value).longDiv(q).remainder;
      |                                                                       ^

DustMite/polyhash.d:32:35: note: instantiated from here: ‘opOpAssign!"*"’
   32 |                                 v *= v;
      |                                   ^
DustMite/splitter.d:50:28: note: instantiated from here: ‘PolynomialHash!(ModQ!(ulong, 18446744073709551557LU))’
   50 |         alias EntityHash = PolynomialHash!(ModQ!(ulong, largest64bitPrime));
      |                            ^

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @the-horo! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + tools#468"

@CyberShadow
Copy link
Member

Thanks, could you please also submit this upstream?

@the-horo
Copy link
Author

Thanks, could you please also submit this upstream?

It seems it has been fixed in CyberShadow/DustMite@b8703eb

@CyberShadow
Copy link
Member

Ah, I guess we're just past due for a sync then.

@CyberShadow
Copy link
Member

Ah, I guess we're just past due for a sync then.

Here it is: #476

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants