Remove several (persistently) failing builds

[tianon]

Each of these has been failing for some period of time with no fix/mitigation forthcoming. We're happy to see them re-enabled if they are fixed/updated.

• eclipse-mosquitto: eclipse-mosquitto:2 Docker Official image based on libressl fails to build on s390x eclipse-mosquitto/mosquitto#3055
• node: Node: feat: Node.js 22.1.0 #16714 (comment), node:22-alpine images miss ppc64le arch nodejs/docker-node#2107 Node: fix: Drop ppc64le from Node 22 Alpine builds #17394
• plone: plone:5.2.4-python3[678] build failures on non-x86_64 platforms plone/plone.docker#161, Release Plone 5.2.9 and 5.2.8 #12915 (comment)
• rethinkdb: Fails to build rethinkdb/rethinkdb-dockerfiles#67 (Is it just me or is there a problem with the download page? rethinkdb/rethinkdb#7153) builds fixed
• satosa: Failing DOI builds on arm32 architectures IdentityPython/satosa-docker#11 (comment)

[tianon]

cc node folks explicitly: @LaurentGoderre @PeterDaveHello @SimenB @Starefossen @nschonni @ttshivers

(this will likely require adjustments in the bot which is generating your library/node PRs -- also, it would be really helpful to include at least one of y'all with at minimum a GitHub handle in Maintainers: so we don't have to go dig up this list on any PR that isn't made by your bot)

[nschonni]

I agree that some of the architectures are broken now, and probably have no simple path to a fix, but I think this needs to go into https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node/blob/main/versions.json for the specific broken node versions. EX: some of the broken things are for v22, or old versions, not all release lines

[tianon]

Indeed, that's what I was trying to get at with this:

this will likely require adjustments in the bot which is generating your library/node PRs

I am not sure exactly where in the Node.js repository those change need to be made to exclude ppc64le from Node.js 22, but yes, to prevent your bot from bringing them right back, this change needs to be made there too.

[nschonni]

Is it just the Alpine ppc64le that's consistently failing, or all the image variants of ppc64le on 22?

[tianon]

Sorry, you're right, just the Alpine variants.

[gabor-boros]

Hey @tianon,
The download server is back online for RethinkDB. Could you please remove that from this Pull Request? Ref: rethinkdb/rethinkdb#7153 (comment)

[tianon]

Thank you, confirmed and done!

[tianon]

Rebased to drop node (#17394)

[github-actions]

Diff for d7725a1:

diff --git a/_bashbrew-arches b/_bashbrew-arches
index 79acf81..0484d35 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-arches
+++ b/_bashbrew-arches
@@ -4,4 +4,3 @@ arm32v7
 arm64v8
 i386
 ppc64le
-s390x
diff --git a/_bashbrew-cat b/_bashbrew-cat
index 7ea1929..0d99ae6 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-cat
+++ b/_bashbrew-cat
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # eclipse-mosquitto
 Maintainers: Roger Light <[email protected]> (@ralight)
-Architectures: amd64, arm32v6, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
+Architectures: amd64, arm32v6, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le
 GitRepo: https://github.com/eclipse/mosquitto.git
 GitCommit: f4400fa422eacac8417efbc45dd1284526dce8d4
 
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ Maintainers: Alin Voinea <[email protected]> (@avoinea), Piero Nicolli <pier
 GitRepo: https://github.com/plone/plone.docker.git
 
 Tags: 5.2.14-python38, 5.2-python38, 5-python38, python38, 5.2.14, 5.2, 5, latest
-Architectures: amd64, arm64v8
 GitCommit: a3a9c7e0c5ca324f488fe7354f00a997398195f7
 Directory: 5.2/5.2.14/debian
 
@@ -36,6 +35,6 @@ Directory: 8.4/alpine3.19
 
 Tags: 8.4.0-bookworm, 8.4-bookworm, 8-bookworm, bookworm
 SharedTags: 8.4.0, 8.4, 8, latest
-Architectures: amd64, arm64v8, ppc64le, s390x
+Architectures: amd64, arm64v8
 GitCommit: 69038a84d541717d66420f3ad8ec7c9da22c91b4
 Directory: 8.4/bookworm

Relevant Maintainers:

• eclipse-mosquitto: @ralight
• plone: @avoinea @pnicolli @svx @demarant @Petchesi-Iulian @valipod
• satosa: @niheconomoum