feat: add svelte starter #282
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Svelte project template utilizing Vite and TypeScript, along with various configuration files and components to support a Dojo Engine integration. Key additions include a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 30
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/world.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment.The implementation looks good. It correctly imports the
createWorldfunction and exports a singletonworldinstance, which is a common pattern in game development and state management.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this file and the
worldconstant. For example:import { createWorld } from "@dojoengine/recs"; // Create and export a singleton world instance for use throughout the application export const world = createWorld();This would help other developers quickly understand the file's purpose and the importance of the
worldconstant.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/vite-env.d.ts (1)
4-8: LGTM: Correct module declaration for Svelte components.The module declaration for "*.svelte" files is well-structured and follows best practices. It correctly imports the ComponentType from Svelte and exports a default component, allowing proper TypeScript integration for Svelte components.
For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this declaration:
+// This declaration allows TypeScript to recognize .svelte files as modules declare module "*.svelte" { import type { ComponentType } from "svelte"; const component: ComponentType; export default component; }examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/svelte.config.js (2)
4-5: Consider updating the comment for clarity.The comment provides a useful link to the Svelte documentation, which is helpful. However, the text mentions "compile-time-svelte-preprocess", while the link points to the general preprocessing documentation. Consider updating the comment to more accurately reflect the linked content.
You could update the comment as follows:
- // Consult https://svelte.dev/docs#compile-time-svelte-preprocess - // for more information about preprocessors + // For more information about Svelte preprocessors, consult: + // https://svelte.dev/docs#svelte-preprocess
1-7: Consider adding more documentation to the configuration file.As this is part of a new Svelte starter template for the dojo.js project, it would be beneficial to add more comments explaining the purpose of this configuration and how it integrates with the dojo.js ecosystem. This could include:
- A brief explanation of why
vitePreprocessis used.- Any specific considerations for dojo.js projects.
- Instructions on how to extend this configuration for more advanced use cases.
This additional documentation would align with the PR objective of updating documentation and would make the starter template more user-friendly for newcomers to both Svelte and dojo.js.
Would you like me to draft an expanded version of this configuration file with additional comments and documentation?
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/vite.config.ts (1)
6-8: Consider additional configuration options.While the basic setup is correct, you might want to consider adding more configuration options depending on your project requirements. Some suggestions:
- Add a
baseoption if the project will be deployed to a subdirectory.- Configure
buildoptions for optimizing the production build.- Set up
resolve.aliasfor common import paths.- Configure
serveroptions for development server settings.Example:
export default defineConfig({ plugins: [svelte(), wasm(), topLevelAwait()], base: '/your-subdirectory/', // If deploying to a subdirectory build: { outDir: 'dist', minify: 'terser', }, resolve: { alias: { '@': '/src', }, }, server: { port: 3000, }, });examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM with a minor suggestion:burnerStoreis correctly defined.The
burnerStoreis properly implemented as a writable store to hold an array ofBurnerobjects. This is suitable for managing multiple burner accounts.Consider maintaining consistent spacing between store definitions. You might want to remove the empty line before this definition to keep the code more compact, or add empty lines between all store definitions for consistency.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/index.html (1)
1-13: Overall: Well-structured HTML template for Vite + Svelte + TypeScript project.This
index.htmlfile provides a solid foundation for your Svelte application. It includes all necessary elements and follows best practices for modern web development.Consider adding a
<noscript>tag with a message for users who have JavaScript disabled, to improve accessibility and user experience.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/createClientComponents.ts (1)
6-10: Consider adding an explicit return type annotation.While TypeScript can infer the return type, adding an explicit return type annotation can improve code readability and serve as documentation. This is especially useful for complex return types.
Consider updating the function signature as follows:
export function createClientComponents({ contractComponents, }: { contractComponents: ContractComponents; }): { [K in keyof ContractComponents]: ReturnType<typeof overridableComponent> } { // ... }This explicit return type accurately represents that all properties of
ContractComponentsare wrapped withoverridableComponent.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/main.ts (1)
7-8: Remove unnecessary comment.The comment about creating a writable store for the setup result is inconsistent with the actual implementation. The code uses predefined stores imported from
./storesinstead.Consider removing this comment to avoid confusion:
-// Create a writable store for the setup resultexamples/example-vite-svelte-recs/tsconfig.json (1)
16-18: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Well-configured module optionsThe remaining compiler options are appropriately set for a modern TypeScript project, especially one using Svelte:
- isolatedModules: true is good for compatibility with transpilers.
- moduleDetection: "force" ensures consistent treatment of files as modules.
- allowSyntheticDefaultImports: true allows for cleaner imports from various libraries.
These settings are suitable for the project. However, consider adding brief comments explaining these options, similar to the JavaScript options above, to improve maintainability for future contributors.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/package.json (3)
6-11: LGTM: Scripts are well-defined, with a minor suggestion.The scripts cover all essential development tasks using Vite and include type checking for both Svelte and TypeScript files. This is a solid configuration for a Svelte project.
Consider adding a
lintscript to ensure code style consistency. For example:"lint": "eslint 'src/**/*.{js,ts,svelte}'"This would require adding ESLint to the devDependencies and configuring it for Svelte and TypeScript.
21-32: LGTM: Dependencies are appropriate for a Dojo engine project with StarkNet integration.The dependencies section is well-configured for a game development project using the Dojo engine and integrating with the StarkNet blockchain. The use of "workspace:*" for some packages indicates a monorepo setup.
Consider adding a brief explanation in the project's README about the purpose of these dependencies, especially the @dojoengine packages and StarkNet integration. This would help new developers understand the project's architecture and requirements.
1-33: Overall, the package.json is well-configured for a Svelte starter project using Dojo engine.The file structure, dependencies, and scripts are appropriate for the project's goals. Here are some general recommendations:
- Update the PR description with details about the Svelte starter template and its integration with Dojo engine.
- Complete the PR checklist items, especially updating documentation and adding tests.
- Consider creating a dedicated CI job for this new example, as mentioned in the PR checklist.
- Ensure that the README for this starter project includes:
- Setup instructions
- Explanation of the Dojo engine integration
- Overview of the project structure
- Any specific requirements or considerations for developers using this starter
These steps will help make the new Svelte starter more accessible and maintainable for other developers.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/app.css (4)
1-14: LGTM! Consider improving color contrast for accessibility.The root styles are well-structured and include performance optimizations. However, the text color (
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.87)) on the dark background (#242424) might not meet WCAG 2.1 AA contrast requirements.Consider adjusting the text color to
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95)or#FFFFFFto improve readability and accessibility.
25-36: LGTM! Consider using relative units for improved responsiveness.The body and heading styles are well-structured. However, using relative units for font sizes and dimensions could improve responsiveness across different device sizes.
Consider updating the h1 font size to use
remunits:h1 { - font-size: 3.2em; + font-size: 3.2rem; line-height: 1.1; }
49-66: LGTM! Button styles are well-defined. Minor suggestion for consistency.The button styles are comprehensive and provide good visual feedback. The focus styles improve accessibility for keyboard users.
For consistency with other time values in the file, consider using seconds instead of milliseconds for the transition duration:
button { - transition: border-color 0.25s; + transition: border-color 0.25s; }
68-79: LGTM! Light mode styles are well-considered. Consider adding a transition for theme changes.The media query for light color scheme ensures a good user experience. The color choices are appropriate for light backgrounds.
To smooth the transition between dark and light modes, consider adding a transition to the root styles:
:root { + transition: color 0.3s ease-in-out, background-color 0.3s ease-in-out; /* other styles... */ }This will create a subtle fade effect when switching between color schemes.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/README.md (3)
9-22: LGTM: Informative comparison with SvelteKitThis section provides valuable context for users choosing between this template and SvelteKit. It clearly explains the benefits and use cases for each option.
Consider revising the phrase "easily-added support" to "easily added support" on line 11 to improve readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...ort for TypeScript, SCSS, and Less, and easily-added support for mdsvex, GraphQL, PostCSS, T...(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...elteKit?** - It brings its own routing solution which might not be preferable for some ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~20-~20: ‘taking into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... with Vite + TypeScript + Svelte, while taking into account the developer experience with regards t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKING_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[misspelling] ~20-~20: Although “with regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...g into account the developer experience with regards to HMR and intellisense. It demonstrates c...(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)
36-40: LGTM: Helpful explanation of HMR behaviorThis section addresses a common issue with Hot Module Replacement (HMR) and state preservation, providing valuable information for users who might encounter this problem.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what HMR stands for when it's first mentioned, as not all users may be familiar with the acronym. For example:
"Hot Module Replacement (HMR) state preservation comes with a number of gotchas!"
1-47: Overall: Excellent README with minor suggestions for improvementThis README file is well-structured, informative, and provides valuable guidance for users getting started with the Svelte + TypeScript + Vite template. It covers essential topics such as setup instructions, comparisons with alternatives, technical considerations, and common issues.
To further enhance the document, consider the following minor improvements:
- Add a brief explanation of what HMR stands for when it's first mentioned.
- Review the document for minor language issues, such as:
- Revising "easily-added support" to "easily added support" (line 11)
- Considering alternatives to the phrase "taking into account" for improved conciseness (line 20)
- Evaluating the use of "with regards to" and potentially replacing it with "regarding" or "concerning" (line 20)
These small changes will polish an already excellent README file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...ort for TypeScript, SCSS, and Less, and easily-added support for mdsvex, GraphQL, PostCSS, T...(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...elteKit?** - It brings its own routing solution which might not be preferable for some ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~20-~20: ‘taking into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... with Vite + TypeScript + Svelte, while taking into account the developer experience with regards t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKING_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[misspelling] ~20-~20: Although “with regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...g into account the developer experience with regards to HMR and intellisense. It demonstrates c...(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)
packages/create-dojo/src/commands/start.ts (1)
29-32: LGTM! Consider a minor adjustment for consistency.The new Svelte template has been added correctly and follows the existing structure. Great job on expanding the available options for users.
For consistency with other template descriptions, consider capitalizing "Basic" in the description:
{ value: "example-vite-svelte-recs", - description: "Basic svelte app using Dojo RECS", + description: "Basic Svelte app using Dojo RECS", },This change would align the capitalization style with other template descriptions.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/componentValueStore.ts (1)
24-28: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for 'entityStore'The variable
entityStoreis not reassigned after its initial declaration. It's better to declare it usingconstto prevent accidental reassignment and improve code readability.Apply this diff:
- let entityStore = derived(dojoStore, ($store) => + const entityStore = derived(dojoStore, ($store) =>examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/setup.ts (1)
84-84: Re-evaluate exposing the entiretoriimoduleReturning the entire
toriimodule may not be necessary sincetoriiClientis already accessible from the returned object. Exposing only what's needed can help keep the API surface minimal and reduce potential misuse.Consider removing
toriifrom the returned object:toriiClient, eventSync, - torii, sync,examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/App.svelte (1)
68-68: Handle potential undefined 'last_direction' in movesYou're displaying
$moves.last_directionwithout checking if it's defined. Iflast_directionisundefined, this could cause unexpected behavior. Consider adding a check to ensure it exists before rendering.Apply this diff to add the check:
- <div>{$moves && $moves.last_direction}</div> + <div>{$moves && $moves.last_direction ? $moves.last_direction : 'No direction'}</div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/bun.lockbis excluded by!**/bun.lockbexamples/example-vite-svelte-recs/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlexamples/example-vite-svelte-recs/public/vite.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/README.md (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/dojoConfig.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/index.html (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/package.json (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/App.svelte (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/app.css (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/componentValueStore.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/createClientComponents.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/setup.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/typescript/contracts.gen.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/typescript/models.gen.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/world.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/handlers.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/vite-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/svelte.config.js (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/tsconfig.node.json (1 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/create-dojo/src/commands/start.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/.gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/README.md
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...ort for TypeScript, SCSS, and Less, and easily-added support for mdsvex, GraphQL, PostCSS, T...(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...elteKit?** - It brings its own routing solution which might not be preferable for some ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~20-~20: ‘taking into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... with Vite + TypeScript + Svelte, while taking into account the developer experience with regards t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKING_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[misspelling] ~20-~20: Although “with regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...g into account the developer experience with regards to HMR and intellisense. It demonstrates c...(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)
🪛 Biome
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/typescript/models.gen.ts
[error] 39-39: Don't use 'String' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'string' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 40-40: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 41-41: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 51-51: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 61-61: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 62-62: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 75-75: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 76-76: Don't use 'String' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'string' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 85-85: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 95-95: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 96-96: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 105-105: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (30)
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/dojoConfig.ts (2)
5-7: Configuration looks good, consider additional options.The
dojoConfigexport usingcreateDojoConfigwith the manifest is correct. However, there might be additional configuration options available forcreateDojoConfig.Run the following script to check for additional configuration options:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for additional configuration options in createDojoConfig # Test: Search for createDojoConfig usage in the codebase rg --type typescript -A 10 'createDojoConfig\(' | grep -v 'examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/dojoConfig.ts'Consider adding any relevant additional options found in other usages of
createDojoConfigthroughout the codebase.
3-3: Verify @dojoengine/core dependency.The
createDojoConfigfunction is imported from "@dojoengine/core". Ensure that this package is listed in the project's dependencies (package.json) with the correct version.Run the following script to check the dependency:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the @dojoengine/core dependency in package.json # Test 1: Check if package.json exists and contains @dojoengine/core if grep -q '"@dojoengine/core"' package.json; then echo "@dojoengine/core is listed in package.json" grep '"@dojoengine/core"' package.json else echo "@dojoengine/core is not found in package.json" fi # Test 2: Check if @dojoengine/core is installed in node_modules if [ -d "node_modules/@dojoengine/core" ]; then echo "@dojoengine/core is installed in node_modules" else echo "@dojoengine/core is not found in node_modules" fiexamples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/vite-env.d.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM: Correct type references for Vite-Svelte project.The type references for Svelte and Vite client are correctly included. These are essential for proper TypeScript support in a Vite-Svelte project.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/svelte.config.js (1)
1-7: LGTM! Standard Svelte configuration for Vite projects.The configuration file is well-structured and follows best practices for a Svelte project using Vite. It correctly imports the
vitePreprocessfunction and sets up the default export with thepreprocessproperty. This setup will enable Vite's preprocessing capabilities for the Svelte application, which is ideal for a starter template.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/tsconfig.node.json (1)
11-11: LGTM: Appropriate file inclusion for Node.js environment.The include section correctly specifies only the "vite.config.ts" file. This is appropriate for a Node.js-specific TypeScript configuration in a Vite project, as it ensures that the Vite configuration is compiled with Node.js-specific settings while allowing the rest of the project to use a separate TypeScript configuration.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/vite.config.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-organized.The necessary modules are imported correctly, following best practices with named imports. The order is logical, starting with core Vite functionality, then Svelte, followed by additional plugins.
6-8: LGTM: Basic Vite configuration is correct.The configuration uses
defineConfigfor proper type checking and includes the necessary plugins for Svelte, WebAssembly, and top-level await support.
1-8: Verify alignment with project structure and requirements.The Vite configuration provides a solid foundation for a Svelte project with WebAssembly and top-level await support. As the project evolves, ensure that:
- The configuration remains in sync with the project's structure and dependencies.
- Any additional build or development requirements are reflected in this file.
- The configuration is consistent with other examples or projects within the dojo.js ecosystem.
To ensure consistency across the project, run the following script:
This will help identify any discrepancies in Vite configurations across the project.
✅ Verification successful
Adjust the shell script to correctly search TypeScript Vite configuration files.
The previous script encountered an error because
rgdid not recognize thetypescriptfile type. Please run the following updated script to check plugin usage in allvite.config.tsfiles:
Vite configuration aligns consistently across project examples.
The
vite.config.tsfor the Svelte project follows the established pattern seen in other examples:
- Utilizes
wasm()andtopLevelAwait()consistently.- Incorporates
svelte()specific to the framework, analogous to how React projects usereact().This alignment ensures that as the project evolves, the configuration remains compatible and maintainable across different setups within the dojo.js ecosystem.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other Vite configurations and compare plugin usage # Find all vite.config.ts files echo "Searching for vite.config.ts files:" fd vite.config.ts # Check plugin usage in other Vite configs echo "\nChecking plugin usage in other Vite configs:" rg --type typescript 'plugins.*=.*\[' -g 'vite.config.ts'Length of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check plugin usage in Vite configurations for TypeScript files echo "Checking plugin usage in Vite configurations:" rg 'plugins\s*:\s*\[' -g 'vite.config.ts' # Alternatively, if rg still has issues, use grep as a fallback if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Using grep as a fallback to check plugin usage:" grep -Hn 'plugins\s*:\s*\[' $(fd vite.config.ts) fiLength of output: 916
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM:dojoStoreis correctly defined.The
dojoStoreis properly defined as a writable store with the correct typeSetupResult. This aligns well with managing the setup state in a Svelte application.
7-7: LGTM:accountStoreis well-defined.The
accountStoreis correctly implemented as a writable store. The typeAccount | nullis a good choice, allowing the store to represent both the presence of an account and its absence.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/index.html (3)
1-2: LGTM: Correct document type and language declaration.The HTML5 doctype and language declaration are correctly implemented.
9-12: LGTM: Correct body structure for a Svelte application.The body section is correctly structured for a Svelte application, with an appropriate mounting point and script tag.
Please verify that the "/src/main.ts" file exists in the project. Run the following script to check:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the main.ts file # Test: Check if the main.ts file exists in the src directory fd -t f "main.ts" srcIf the file is not found, ensure that you've created the main TypeScript file for your Svelte application.
3-8: LGTM: Well-structured head section with a minor suggestion.The head section is well-structured and includes all necessary meta tags. The title accurately reflects the project's tech stack.
Please verify that the "/vite.svg" icon file exists in the project's public directory. Run the following script to check:
If the file is not found, consider updating the icon path or adding the file to the project.
✅ Verification successful
Follow-Up Action: Verify the Existence of
vite.svgin the RepositoryPlease run the following script to search the entire repository for the
vite.svgfile:If the
vite.svgfile is located in a different directory or does not exist, please update the icon path inindex.htmlaccordingly or add the missingvite.svgfile to the project.
Verification Successful:
vite.svgExists in Public DirectoryThe
vite.svgicon file is present in theexamples/example-vite-svelte-recs/public/directory, ensuring the icon path inindex.htmlis valid.
- File Path:
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/public/vite.svg🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the vite.svg icon file # Test: Check if the vite.svg file exists in the public directory fd -t f "vite.svg" publicLength of output: 206
Script:
#~/CodeRabbit/scripts/verify_vite_svg.sh #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the vite.svg icon file in the repository # Test: Search for vite.svg anywhere in the repository fd -t f "vite.svg"Length of output: 218
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/createClientComponents.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports and type alias are well-structured.The import statements and type alias are correctly implemented. The use of a type alias for the function's return type is a good practice for type safety and code readability.
1-16: Overall, good implementation with room for minor improvements.The
createClientComponentsfunction is well-structured and uses TypeScript features effectively. Consider the following improvements:
- Add an explicit return type annotation to the function for better clarity.
- Clarify whether all properties of
contractComponentsshould be wrapped withoverridableComponent, and if so, implement a more dynamic approach.- Ensure consistent usage of
overridableComponentacross the project.These changes will enhance the code's robustness and maintainability. Great job on implementing this new feature!
11-16: Clarify the wrapping of component properties.The current implementation explicitly wraps only
PositionandMoveswithoverridableComponent. It's unclear if other properties ofcontractComponentsshould also be wrapped.If all properties should be wrapped, consider a more dynamic approach:
return Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(contractComponents).map(([key, value]) => [ key, overridableComponent(value) ]) );This would ensure all components are consistently wrapped. Please clarify if this is the intended behavior.
To verify the current usage, we can run the following script:
This will help us understand if
overridableComponentis used consistently across the project.✅ Verification successful
Fix the file type identifier for ripgrep.
The previous script used an unrecognized file type
typescript. Updating the file type totsshould allow the search to execute correctly.
**Wrapping of component properties is limited to
PositionandMoves, which aligns with their usage in the codebase. No additional properties require wrapping.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of overridableComponent in the codebase # Test: Search for other usages of overridableComponent rg --type typescript 'overridableComponent\(' --glob '!**/createClientComponents.ts'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of overridableComponent in the codebase # Test: Search for other usages of overridableComponent rg --type ts 'overridableComponent\(' --glob '!**/createClientComponents.ts'Length of output: 356
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/main.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements cover all necessary modules for initializing the Svelte application with Dojo integration. This includes styles, the main component, setup function, configuration, and stores.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/tsconfig.json (4)
1-3: LGTM: Proper extension and structureThe configuration correctly extends from "@tsconfig/svelte/tsconfig.json", which is a good practice for Svelte projects. The overall structure of the file is correct and follows the JSON format.
Also applies to: 20-22
4-7: LGTM: Appropriate compiler optionsThe compiler options are well-configured for a modern Svelte project:
- Using "ESNext" for both target and module ensures the latest ECMAScript features are utilized.
- Setting useDefineForClassFields to true is correct for modern class field behavior.
- Enabling resolveJsonModule allows for importing JSON files as modules, which can be useful in many scenarios.
8-15: LGTM: Well-documented JavaScript optionsThe JavaScript-related compiler options are appropriately set and well-documented:
- Both allowJs and checkJs are enabled, allowing for the inclusion and type-checking of JavaScript files.
- This configuration is particularly useful in a Svelte project where .svelte files may contain JavaScript.
- The explanatory comment provides clear guidance on these options and their implications, which is excellent for maintainability.
1-22: Overall: Excellent TypeScript configuration for SvelteThis tsconfig.json file is well-structured and appropriately configured for a Svelte project using TypeScript. It extends the recommended Svelte TypeScript configuration and includes sensible compiler options that enable modern JavaScript features, proper module handling, and comprehensive type checking.
The configuration demonstrates good practices such as:
- Extending from a Svelte-specific base configuration.
- Using the latest ECMAScript features.
- Enabling JavaScript inclusion and type checking.
- Configuring module-related options for better compatibility and consistency.
The only minor suggestion is to consider adding brief explanatory comments for the less common compiler options, similar to the existing comments for JavaScript options. This would further enhance the file's maintainability.
Great job on setting up a robust TypeScript configuration for this Svelte project!
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/package.json (1)
1-5: LGTM: Project metadata is well-configured.The project metadata is appropriately set up for a Svelte starter project. The private flag prevents accidental publishing, and the use of ES modules is a good choice for modern JavaScript development.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/app.css (2)
16-23: LGTM! Anchor styles are well-defined.The anchor styles are concise and provide clear visual feedback. The use of consistent color values is commendable.
38-47: LGTM! Card and app container styles are appropriate.The card and app container styles provide a good foundation for layout. The max-width on #app ensures content readability on larger screens.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/README.md (3)
1-7: LGTM: Clear and concise introductionThe introduction and setup instructions are well-written and provide essential information for users getting started with this template.
24-34: LGTM: Well-explained technical considerationsThis section provides clear and thorough explanations for important configuration choices, such as using
global.d.ts, including.vscode/extensions.json, and enablingallowJs. These explanations will help users understand the project structure and make informed decisions when customizing the template.
42-47: LGTM: Clear example of external store usageThe provided code example effectively demonstrates how to create a simple external store for state management. This practical illustration complements the earlier explanation about HMR state preservation and offers users a concrete solution.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/componentValueStore.ts (1)
1-53: Code is well-structured and functions as intendedThe implementation of
componentValueStorecorrectly creates a Svelte store that manages component values for a specific entity. Reactive updates and cleanup are properly handled, ensuring efficient memory management and responsiveness to data changes.examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/setup.ts (1)
69-70: Avoid swallowing initialization errors silentlyLogging errors without proper handling can lead to issues that are hard to debug. Ensure that critical initialization errors do not fail silently.
This concern has been addressed in the previous comment about improving error handling in the catch block.
examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/dojo/typescript/models.gen.ts (1)
180-180: Ensure consistent type forvecinPositioncomponentIn the
Positioncomponent definition,vecis typed usingVec2Definition. Ensure that this matches the data structure expected by the component and that serialization is handled correctly.Please confirm that
Vec2Definitionis correctly defined and compatible withdefineComponent.
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
| import manifest from "../manifests/dev/deployment/manifest.json"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
@dojoengine/core dependency is missing.
The package.json does not include "@dojoengine/core", and it is not found in node_modules. Ensure that "@dojoengine/core" is listed as a dependency and properly installed to resolve import issues in dojoConfig.ts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the manifest file's existence and generation process.
The manifest is imported from a relative path. Ensure that this file exists in the specified location and is correctly generated or updated during the build/deployment process.
Run the following script to check the manifest file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the manifest file and check its content.
# Test 1: Check if the manifest file exists
if [ -f "../manifests/dev/deployment/manifest.json" ]; then
echo "Manifest file exists."
# Test 2: Display the first few lines of the manifest file
head -n 5 "../manifests/dev/deployment/manifest.json"
else
echo "Manifest file does not exist at the specified path."
fi
# Test 3: Search for any scripts that might generate or update the manifest
fd -e sh -e js -e ts --exec grep -l "manifest.json" {}
Length of output: 288
| "compilerOptions": { | ||
| "composite": true, | ||
| "tsBuildInfoFile": "./node_modules/.tmp/tsconfig.node.tsbuildinfo", | ||
| "skipLibCheck": true, | ||
| "module": "ESNext", | ||
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", | ||
| "strict": true, | ||
| "noEmit": true | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing compiler options for improved clarity and future-proofing.
The current compiler options are well-configured for a Vite project using Svelte and TypeScript. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add
"target": "ESNext"to explicitly set the ECMAScript target version. - Consider adding
"esModuleInterop": truefor better interoperability with CommonJS modules. - Add
"resolveJsonModule": trueto allow importing JSON files as modules. - Consider adding
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": trueto ensure consistent file naming across different operating systems.
Here's a suggested update to the compiler options:
"compilerOptions": {
"composite": true,
"tsBuildInfoFile": "./node_modules/.tmp/tsconfig.node.tsbuildinfo",
"skipLibCheck": true,
"module": "ESNext",
+ "target": "ESNext",
"moduleResolution": "bundler",
"strict": true,
- "noEmit": true
+ "noEmit": true,
+ "esModuleInterop": true,
+ "resolveJsonModule": true,
+ "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true
},These additions will make the configuration more robust and explicit, potentially preventing future issues and improving developer experience.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "compilerOptions": { | |
| "composite": true, | |
| "tsBuildInfoFile": "./node_modules/.tmp/tsconfig.node.tsbuildinfo", | |
| "skipLibCheck": true, | |
| "module": "ESNext", | |
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", | |
| "strict": true, | |
| "noEmit": true | |
| }, | |
| "compilerOptions": { | |
| "composite": true, | |
| "tsBuildInfoFile": "./node_modules/.tmp/tsconfig.node.tsbuildinfo", | |
| "skipLibCheck": true, | |
| "module": "ESNext", | |
| "target": "ESNext", | |
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", | |
| "strict": true, | |
| "noEmit": true, | |
| "esModuleInterop": true, | |
| "resolveJsonModule": true, | |
| "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true | |
| }, |
| import { writable, derived } from "svelte/store"; | ||
| import { type SetupResult } from "./dojo/setup"; | ||
| import { Account } from "starknet"; | ||
| import { type Burner } from "@dojoengine/create-burner"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unused derived import.
- The
derivedimport from"svelte/store"is not used in this file.
🔗 Analysis chain
Remove unused import and verify local module.
- The
derivedimport from 'svelte/store' is not used in this file. Consider removing it to keep the imports clean. - The import from './dojo/setup' uses a relative path. Please ensure that this local module exists and is correctly located.
To verify the local module and check for unused imports, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify local module existence and check for unused imports
# Test 1: Check if the local module exists
echo "Checking for local module 'dojo/setup'..."
fd --type file --glob '*setup.{ts,js}' src/dojo
# Test 2: Check for unused imports
echo "Checking for unused imports..."
rg --type typescript 'derived' examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts
Length of output: 429
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify local module existence and check for unused imports
# Test 1: Check if the local module 'dojo/setup' exists anywhere in the repository
echo "Re-checking for local module 'dojo/setup' across the repository..."
fd --type file --glob 'setup.{ts,js}'
# Test 2: Check for unused 'derived' import by searching its usage in TypeScript and JavaScript files
echo "Re-checking for unused 'derived' imports in TypeScript and JavaScript files..."
rg 'derived' --type-add 'custom=*.ts,*.js' --type custom examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts
Length of output: 950
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify local module existence and check for unused imports with corrected rg syntax
# Test 1: Check if the local module 'dojo/setup' exists anywhere in the repository
echo "Re-checking for local module 'dojo/setup' across the repository..."
fd --type file --glob 'setup.{ts,js}'
# Test 2: Check for unused 'derived' import by searching its usage in TypeScript and JavaScript files
echo "Re-checking for unused 'derived' imports in TypeScript and JavaScript files..."
rg 'derived' --type-add 'custom:*.ts,*.js' --type custom examples/example-vite-svelte-recs/src/stores.ts
Length of output: 940
| async function initApp() { | ||
| // Update the store with the setup result | ||
| let setupRes = await setup(dojoConfig) | ||
| dojoStore.set(setupRes); | ||
| burnerStore.set(setupRes.burnerManager.list()); | ||
| accountStore.set(setupRes.burnerManager.getActiveAccount()) | ||
|
|
||
| console.log("App initialized"); | ||
|
|
||
| const app = new App({ | ||
| target: document.getElementById("app")!, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return app; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling and type safety in initApp function.
While the function logic is sound, there are opportunities to improve error handling and type safety:
- Add error handling for the asynchronous setup call.
- Use type assertions or checks for the DOM element.
- Consider adding return type annotation for better type inference.
Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:
async function initApp(): Promise<App> {
try {
const setupRes = await setup(dojoConfig);
dojoStore.set(setupRes);
burnerStore.set(setupRes.burnerManager.list());
accountStore.set(setupRes.burnerManager.getActiveAccount());
console.log("App initialized");
const appElement = document.getElementById("app");
if (!appElement) {
throw new Error("App element not found");
}
return new App({
target: appElement,
});
} catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to initialize app:", error);
throw error;
}
}This implementation adds error handling, ensures the DOM element exists, and provides a return type for better type inference.
| return app; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export default initApp(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Revise the default export to avoid potential issues.
Exporting the result of an asynchronous function call as the default export can lead to unexpected behavior. The current implementation might not work correctly in all scenarios, especially when other modules try to import and use this module.
Consider changing the export to the function itself:
export default initApp;This allows the importing module to decide when and how to call the initialization function. If automatic initialization is desired, you could use a separate file or add an event listener for DOMContentLoaded:
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
initApp().catch(console.error);
});This approach provides more flexibility and ensures that the DOM is ready before initializing the app.
| x: Number; | ||
| y: Number; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use lowercase number in Vec2 interface
In the Vec2 interface, the properties x and y are typed as Number. Replace them with the lowercase primitive type number.
Apply the following changes:
export interface Vec2 {
- x: Number;
- y: Number;
+ x: number;
+ y: number;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| x: Number; | |
| y: Number; | |
| x: number; | |
| y: number; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 95-95: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 96-96: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
|
|
||
| // Type definition for `dojo_starter::models::Position` struct | ||
| export interface Position { | ||
| player: BigInt; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use lowercase bigint in Position interface
The player property in the Position interface is typed as BigInt. Replace it with bigint.
Apply the following change:
export interface Position {
- player: BigInt;
vec: Vec2;
+ player: bigint;
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 105-105: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
|
|
||
| // Type definition for `dojo_starter::systems::actions::actions::Moved` struct | ||
| export interface Moved { | ||
| player: BigInt; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use lowercase bigint in Moved interface
The player property in the Moved interface is typed as BigInt. Replace it with bigint.
Apply the following change:
export interface Moved {
- player: BigInt;
direction: Direction;
+ player: bigint;
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 85-85: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| world, | ||
| { | ||
| player: RecsType.BigInt, | ||
| direction: RecsType.String, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent type for direction in Moved component
In the Moved component definition, direction is typed as RecsType.String, but in the Moved interface, it's typed as Direction. For consistency, consider updating direction to match the Direction type.
Apply the following change:
{
player: RecsType.BigInt,
- direction: RecsType.String,
+ direction: DirectionDefinition,
},This ensures that the direction property accurately reflects the Direction enum type.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| { | ||
| player: RecsType.BigInt, | ||
| remaining: RecsType.Number, | ||
| last_direction: RecsType.String, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent type for last_direction in Moves component
In the Moves component definition, last_direction is typed as RecsType.String, but in the Moves interface, it's typed as Direction, which is an enum. To maintain consistency and type safety, consider updating last_direction to match the Direction type.
Apply the following change:
{
player: RecsType.BigInt,
remaining: RecsType.Number,
- last_direction: RecsType.String,
+ last_direction: DirectionDefinition,
can_move: RecsType.Boolean,
},Alternatively, if Direction should be serialized differently, ensure that both the interface and component definition are consistent.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
can you re pnpm |
Closes #
Introduced changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
.gitignoreto ignorenode_modulesand maintain a cleaner repository.