Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: consensus messages #141

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

feat: consensus messages #141

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

faultytolly
Copy link
Contributor

@faultytolly faultytolly commented Sep 27, 2024

Description

ADR link https://www.notion.so/dymension/ADR-x-Sequencer-Messages-34f95e2b579e458e8bb4252da19324bd

Closes https://github.com/dymensionxyz/epics/issues/1


All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

PR review checkboxes:

I have...

  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Targeted PR against the correct branch
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Linked to the GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design
  • Targets only one GitHub issue
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Wrote relevant migration scripts if necessary
  • All CI checks have passed
  • Added relevant godoc comments
  • Updated the scripts for local run, e.g genesis_config_commands.sh if the PR changes parameters
  • Add an issue in the e2e-tests repo if necessary

SDK Checklist

  • Import/Export Genesis
  • Registered Invariants
  • Registered Events
  • Updated openapi.yaml
  • No usage of go map
  • No usage of time.Now()
  • Used fixed point arithmetic and not float arithmetic
  • Avoid panicking in Begin/End block as much as possible
  • No unexpected math Overflow
  • Used sendCoin and not SendCoins
  • Out-of-block compute is bounded
  • No serialized ID at the end of store keys
  • UInt to byte conversion should use BigEndian

Full security checklist here

----;

For Reviewer:

  • Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Reviewers assigned
  • Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

---;

After reviewer approval:

  • In case the PR targets the main branch, PR should not be squash merge in order to keep meaningful git history.
  • In case the PR targets a release branch, PR must be rebased.

@keruch keruch self-requested a review October 2, 2024 19:15
@keruch keruch marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2024 19:15
@keruch keruch requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2024 19:15
Copy link

@keruch keruch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! all comments are the same as for the rollapp-evm PR: dymensionxyz/rollapp-evm#351

app/app.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Outdated

theType, err := proto.Marshal(resp)
if err != nil {
return nil
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why return nil? don't you need to append to responses and continue?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need to verify if this type of error is expected

app/app_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +88 to +89
_, isError := response.Response.(*abci.ConsensusMessageResponse_Error)
require.True(t, isError, "Expected an error response but got a success")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'd also suggest verifying the returned error string

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danwt does not like to check error strings

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea but it's still better than nothing

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

think in theory you can check grpc status code
i haven't looked at it tho

app/test_helpers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@keruch keruch changed the title feat: add consensus messages feat: consensus messages Oct 2, 2024
app/app.go Outdated
return resp
}

func (app *App) processConsensusMessage(ctx sdk.Context, consensusMsgs []*prototypes.Any) []*abci.ConsensusMessageResponse {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comments as on the evm repo - and also as I wrote there - I suggest moving this method to common util on the RDK vs re-writing it (if possible) .

@@ -827,6 +832,11 @@ func NewRollapp(
// upgrade.
app.setPostHandler()

// Admission handler for consensus messages
app.setAdmissionHandler(consensus.AllowedMessagesHandler([]string{
proto.MessageName(&banktypes.MsgSend{}),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this message allowed?

@omritoptix omritoptix merged commit 692fb70 into main Oct 21, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants