Skip to content

fix: reorganize repl code #141

fix: reorganize repl code

fix: reorganize repl code #141

Triggered via pull request October 28, 2024 22:28
@jaromiljaromil
synchronize #41
fix/repl-reorg
Status Success
Total duration 1m 52s
Artifacts

main.yml

on: pull_request
🚨 REUSE Compliance
22s
🚨 REUSE Compliance
🚨 C lint
24s
🚨 C lint
🐧 Musl Linux test
15s
🐧 Musl Linux test
πŸͺŸ Windows native test
1m 7s
πŸͺŸ Windows native test
🍎 OSX native test
14s
🍎 OSX native test
πŸ€– Semantic release
0s
πŸ€– Semantic release
🐧 Musl Linux binary release build
0s
🐧 Musl Linux binary release build
πŸͺŸ Windows native binary release build
0s
πŸͺŸ Windows native binary release build
🍎 OSX native binary release build
0s
🍎 OSX native binary release build
πŸ“¦ Pack release
0s
πŸ“¦ Pack release
🧻 Remove tag on fail
0s
🧻 Remove tag on fail
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

6 warnings
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L258: src/repl.c#L258
Redundant blank line at the end of a code block should be deleted. [whitespace/blank_line] [3]
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L288: src/repl.c#L288
Almost always, snprintf is better than strcat [runtime/printf] [4]
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L343: src/repl.c#L343
Almost always, snprintf is better than strcpy [runtime/printf] [4]
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L367: src/repl.c#L367
Almost always, snprintf is better than strcat [runtime/printf] [4]
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L405: src/repl.c#L405
Almost always, snprintf is better than strcat [runtime/printf] [4]
[cpplint] src/repl.c#L354: src/repl.c#L354
Add #include <cstdio> for fflush [build/include_what_you_use] [4]