Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Empty XTSAN tests list #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

Empty XTSAN tests list #133

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

juanlofer-eprosima
Copy link
Contributor

Up to eProsima/eProsima-CI#77 , almost every test using Fast-DDS was reporting multiple TSAN warnings that were in fact false positives. For this reason these tests were categorized as flaky when running the TSAN action, but after the update in eProsima-CI they should no longer fail.

@juanlofer-eprosima
Copy link
Contributor Author

juanlofer-eprosima commented Mar 25, 2024

Tests are failing because only ddsrecorder packages are compiled with TSAN, while it should be every single package to avoid false positives like it is the case here.

EDIT:
The reported warning involving the FastPayloadPool actually was not a false positive. The data race was solved in eProsima/DDS-Pipe#110.
Another data race in DDS-Pipe was spotted by running the recorder tests, and its solution delivered in eProsima/DDS-Pipe#115.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.00%. Comparing base (4c358be) to head (a97921c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #133      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   24.02%   24.00%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        4008     4007       -1     
  Branches     2070     2070              
==========================================
- Hits          963      962       -1     
- Misses       2348     2353       +5     
+ Partials      697      692       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Juan Lopez Fernandez <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@irenebm irenebm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@irenebm irenebm merged commit a2af440 into main Jul 11, 2024
19 checks passed
@irenebm irenebm deleted the feature/remove-xtsan branch July 11, 2024 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants