Fix batchspawner for JupyterHub 3.0

[casparvl]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Batchspawner 1.2.0 doesn't work with JupyterHub3.X. Main contains the necessary fixes, but no release is available. Installing from commit 2a9eda0 does contain the necessary support.

Note that this avoids the

batchspawner/singleuser.py:17: RuntimeWarning: coroutine 'HubAuth._api_request' was never awaited
  hub_auth._api_request(

error thrown by batchspawner 1.2.0 (in combination with JH 3.0).

See jupyterhub/batchspawner#277

[casparvl]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18390 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18390 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 11292

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1650204999 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[casparvl]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

[boegelbot]

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18390 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18390 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3019

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1650206520 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/1d9acdecf1d3f3f543f6fb9079e9bbde for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/fc50d6dc12d2ceff622479f43144a12a for a full test report.

[casparvl]

Test report by @casparvl
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
tcn1.local.snellius.surf.nl - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7H12 64-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/casparvl/f731fd1cdbd15aa460d78eae2bdfea32 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/cc2aeacb8a8d654e9bcf0163ca5ba356 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Hmm, not sure why the two remote test builds are failing.

[casparvl]

Maybe they triggered at the same time as my rebuild off jupyter-server in https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-26834 ...
Let me try to rerun them here.

[casparvl]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18390 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18390 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 11297

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1651692597 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/b19c8c8f1e0598dedc4bf69981d2b3e1 for a full test report.

[casparvl]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

[casparvl]

yep, that seems to have been the issue. The other run was rebuilding jupyter-server, probably while this one was also being build. That resulted in a missing module for the jupyter-server dependency of jupyter-server-proxy (which is a dependency of this JupyterHub 3.0 easyconfig). Mystery solved - assuming it succeeds on jsc-zen2 now as well :)

[boegelbot]

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18390 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18390 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3023

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1651709903 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/801b201d3eb824d7c9d9ae99caccab07 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Looks fine.

[verdurin]

Going in, thanks @casparvl!