Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add 1.9.22.1 release notes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
kriegaex committed May 11, 2024
1 parent e756040 commit 64b86bc
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 38 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/index.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ JDK to run
// AspectJ_JDK_Update: add new release to table
|Release notes |Release notes, describing new features, improvements, bugfixes per AspectJ version: +
+
xref:release/README-1.9.22.adoc[1.9.22],
xref:release/README-1.9.22.adoc[1.9.22 / 1.9.22.1],
xref:release/README-1.9.21.adoc[1.9.21 / 1.9.21.1 / 1.9.21.2], xref:release/README-1.9.20.adoc[1.9.20 / 1.9.20.1],
xref:release/README-1.9.19.adoc[1.9.19], xref:release/README-1.9.9.adoc[1.9.9 / 1.9.9.1],
xref:release/README-1.9.8.adoc[1.9.8], xref:release/README-1.9.7.adoc[1.9.7],
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/release/JavaVersionCompatibility.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ be easily concluded from the AspectJ version number anymore, and we are sorry fo
[%autowidth, stripes=even, options="header"]
|===
|AspectJ version |Java version |Comments
|1.9.22 |22 |
|1.9.22 - 1.9.22.1 |22 |
|1.9.21 - 1.9.21.2 |21 |AspectJ compiler requires JDK 17+ during build time. During runtime, AspectJ still only requires Java 8+ for both compile-time and load-time weaving. Pure Java code can be compiled down to as old as 1.3 byte code level.
|1.9.20 - 1.9.20.1 |20 |
|1.9.19 |19 |
Expand Down
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions docs/release/README-1.9.22.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,46 @@
= AspectJ 1.9.22
:doctype: book
:leveloffset: +1

The releases 1.9.22 and 1.9.22.1 are described together in this document.

= AspectJ 1.9.22.1

// AspectJ_JDK_Update: Each a.b.c release needs a new release notes document. For a.b.c.d minors, the existing a.b.c
// document can be updated. After copying this document, remove the comment from the previous one.

_© Copyright 2024 Contributors. All rights reserved._

_Release info: 1.9.22.1 available 11-May-2024_

Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.22.1 can be
found here:

* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.22.1[GitHub 1.9.22.1]
* https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.22.1[Bugzilla 1.9.22.1]

== New features

AspectJ 1.9.22.1 has no new features, only bugfixes and improvements.

== Improvements

* The pointcut parser now traverses type parameters in generic types, e.g. in `MyType<A, B>` it also traverses the
previously ignored type parameters `A` and `B`, enabling future improvements like more exact type matching or checks
for illegal primitive type parameters. See link:https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/221[issue #221].
* link:https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/306[Performance issue due to repeated attempts to find classes without FQN]

== Other changes and bug fixes

* link:https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/211[AJC core dump when mixing type name wildcards with generics]
* link:https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/302[Potential ThreadLocalMap.Entry accumulation in JoinPointImpl]
* link:https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/305[WeavingAdaptor optimisations cause Equinox weaving problems]

= AspectJ 1.9.22

_© Copyright 2024 Contributors. All rights reserved._

_Release info: 1.9.22 available 23-Mar-2024_

Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 64b86bc

Please sign in to comment.