-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for JPQL queries where identifier clashes with function #2218
Fix for JPQL queries where identifier clashes with function #2218
Conversation
…as a function E.g., if Box entity has field "length", "delete from Box where length = 1" fails This commit fixes it. To do: - fix copyright headers
Tests with entityManager for SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE with implicit variable
* fix tests in AbstractGrammarValidatorTest for invalid numeric literals. Simplified my previous changes. Recompute word type after reverting functions without arguments. This avoids a literal would be parsed as a number * fix test advanced.JUnitJPQLModifyTest.updateUnqualifiedAttributeInWhere. An implicit variable was incorrectly added in a nested statement, in which an explicit variable was defined
* @return <code>true</code> if the given sequence of characters is a valid numeric literal; | ||
* <code>false</code> otherwise | ||
*/ | ||
protected boolean isNumericLiteral(String text) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't delete this method, just moved it to the NumericLiteral class and renamed to hasValidValue
, so that it can be used also in the parser, not only in the validator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you did an API change in a public API. Is it required to fix the bug? If so, re-do it in a backward compatible way, with appropriate deprecation step eventually, please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found a different way to fix the bug, so I reverted removing this method.
@@ -256,6 +257,7 @@ public int length() { | |||
*/ | |||
public void moveBackward(CharSequence word) { | |||
cursor -= word.length(); | |||
wordEndPosition(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needed to reset the word parser
* | ||
* @return Parent expression | ||
*/ | ||
public final ParentExpression getParentExpression() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For a query "SELECT e Employee e WHERE (SELECT COUNT(m) FROM managedEmployees m) > 0)", it will return root expression for subexpressions related to the a
variable, and will return the nested SELECT COUNT(m)
expression for subexpressions related to the m
variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general, the code change/fix looks (mostly) good, but given the bug is in the JPQL parser related tests belong to the jpa.test.jpql
test app where a test can just reuse existing Room/SimpleRoom entity from the advanced model available there instead of changing jpa.test.persistence32
app dedicated to 3.2 related features
* @return <code>true</code> if the given sequence of characters is a valid numeric literal; | ||
* <code>false</code> otherwise | ||
*/ | ||
protected boolean isNumericLiteral(String text) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you did an API change in a public API. Is it required to fix the bug? If so, re-do it in a backward compatible way, with appropriate deprecation step eventually, please.
...rsistence.jpa.jpql/src/main/java/org/eclipse/persistence/jpa/jpql/parser/NumericLiteral.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nce.jpa.jpql/src/test/java/org/eclipse/persistence/jpa/tests/jpql/parser/JPQLParserTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
note that JUnitJPQLJakartaDataNoAliasTest may be a good place for more complex tests for queries with no alias |
@@ -11,10 +12,15 @@ | |||
*/ | |||
package org.eclipse.persistence.testing.tests.jpa.persistence32; | |||
|
|||
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.equalTo; | |||
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is; | |||
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no single use of hamcrest in the repo and the project itself is happy without it, so do not add it, please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed Hamcrest assertions. The hamcrest dependency is transitively brought to the project by junit. Maybe it would be good to exclude hamcrest from the project. I wouldn't use it if I saw it's excluded.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
inability to avoid hamcrest dependency is known junit 3/4 issue - see ie junit-team/junit4#1145 and/or junit-team/junit4#1741 if you're interested in details
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is no longer true with latest versions of JUnit 4. The Hamcrest dependency of JUnit can be excluded, see: OmniFish-EE@1e6a11c. Should I raise a PR to do it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is no longer true with latest versions of JUnit 4. The Hamcrest dependency of JUnit can be excluded, see: OmniFish-EE@1e6a11c. Should I raise a PR to do it?
I did it in #2226
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is no longer true with latest versions of JUnit 4. The Hamcrest dependency of JUnit can be excluded, see: OmniFish-EE@1e6a11c. Should I raise a PR to do it?
It looks not so easy in EclipseLink project. There are test failures in #2226
mvn clean verify -pl :org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.jpql
throws exception in org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.tests.jpql.AllHermesTests
. I think it's releated with @RunWith
, org.junit.runner.RunWith
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like hamcrest is used somewhere. Maybe by JUnit itself. Here seems to be the same problem: #261. At that time, it looks like it was necessary to add hamcrest on the classpath in Ant configuration. But the problem was the same - something needed Hamcrest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, JUnit 4 uses hamcrest in several places: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Ajunit-team%2Fjunit4+hamcrest+language%3AJava&type=code&l=Java. So it's not possible to completely remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A solution could be to make hamcrest a runtime dependency. JUnit would work but it couldn't be used in compiled code.
Moved the check for invalid expression to general places in expression and factory.
This method is no longer needed in NumericLiteral after fixes in the previous commit.
Uses existing Room entity with a field named "length" Note: the test "JUnitJPQLJakartaDataNoAliasTest.tesUpdateQueryWithThisVariable" is still failing
Thank you for your review, @lukasj . I made the changes you requested, please review again. I moved the tests into JUnitJPQLJakartaDataNoAliasTest and used the Room entity as you suggested. |
thanks! |
…clipse-ee4j#2218)" This reverts commit 5fe6040.
…clipse-ee4j#2218)" This reverts commit 5fe6040.
Provides test cases and fix for #2187
Adds some more test cases and fixes for implicit variable
this
in JPQL queries.