-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[4352] Add support to range column filters in table #4353
Open
frouene
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
fro/enh/table-range-filter
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions
58
...rius-components-core/src/test/java/org/eclipse/sirius/components/core/URLParserTests.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | ||
/******************************************************************************* | ||
* Copyright (c) 2025 CEA LIST. | ||
* This program and the accompanying materials | ||
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v2.0 | ||
* which accompanies this distribution, and is available at | ||
* https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/ | ||
* | ||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Contributors: | ||
* Obeo - initial API and implementation | ||
*******************************************************************************/ | ||
package org.eclipse.sirius.components.core; | ||
|
||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||
|
||
import java.util.List; | ||
|
||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Tests of the URLParser. | ||
* | ||
* @author frouene | ||
*/ | ||
public class URLParserTests { | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testGetParameterEntriesWithNestedLists() { | ||
URLParser parser = new URLParser(); | ||
String value = "[467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"\"],4752c1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"2\"]]"; | ||
List<String> expected = List.of( | ||
"467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"\"]", | ||
"4752c1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"2\"]" | ||
); | ||
List<String> result = parser.getParameterEntries(value); | ||
assertThat(expected).isEqualTo(result); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testGetParameterEntriesWithEmptyList() { | ||
URLParser parser = new URLParser(); | ||
String value = "[]"; | ||
List<String> expected = List.of(); | ||
List<String> result = parser.getParameterEntries(value); | ||
assertThat(expected).isEqualTo(result); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testGetParameterEntriesWithSingleElement() { | ||
URLParser parser = new URLParser(); | ||
String value = "[467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"\"]]"; | ||
List<String> expected = List.of("467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:[\"1\",\"\"]"); | ||
List<String> result = parser.getParameterEntries(value); | ||
assertThat(expected).isEqualTo(result); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you explain me what this change of behavior supposed to do? It's a bit complex to understand just from a Quick Look at the code, what is the difference in the old vs new behavior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the filter values of a column can be a list, we end up with uri of this type
[467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:["0","1"],4752c1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:["1","2"]]
The previous implementation of
getParameterEntries
split each,
whiche end up giving something like467ec1c3-8ba7-32dc-9d72-71a2ccad161b:["0"
,"1"]
...In the new approach, I consider the level of
[
to only split the first list.