Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide options to patch the checkpoint metadata when running a model #73

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

b8raoult
Copy link
Collaborator

@b8raoult b8raoult commented Dec 5, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.00%. Comparing base (57bbe09) to head (7f12d4d).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #73   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    75.00%   75.00%           
========================================
  Files            1        1           
  Lines            4        4           
========================================
  Hits             3        3           
  Misses           1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@b8raoult b8raoult changed the title Feature/patch Provide options to patch the checkpoint metadata when running a model Dec 7, 2024
@b8raoult b8raoult dismissed HCookie’s stale review December 11, 2024 19:38

The merge-base changed after approval.

HCookie
HCookie previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2024
@b8raoult b8raoult merged commit 3afa7ed into develop Dec 12, 2024
118 of 119 checks passed
@b8raoult b8raoult deleted the feature/patch branch December 12, 2024 10:42
@HCookie HCookie mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants