-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
security: add permissions block to workflows #1575
Conversation
.github/workflows/snapshoty.yml
Outdated
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ on: | |||
- '*.asciidoc' | |||
- 'docs/**' | |||
|
|||
permissions: | |||
contents: read | |||
actions: read |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the reason for actions:read
? I don't recall we needed it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I re-ran the gh-oblt script on this repo, and for some reason, this was added.
I don't know why it was missing since the workflow doesn't have a top-level permissions block.
I need to dig into this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But yes, looking at the snapshoty-simple action, I also don't see a reason for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actions: read |
Details
We want to set the default permissions for workflows to read-only for contents.
This is a security measure to prevent accidental changes to the repository.
This change adds a top-level permissions block to all workflows in the .github/workflows directory.
In some cases workflows might need more permissions than just
contents: read
.Please checkout this branch and add the necessary permissions to the workflows.
If your workflow uses a Personal Access Token (PAT), we can still add the permissions block,
but it will not have any effect.
Merging this PR as is might cause workflows that need more permissions to fail.
If there are any questions, please reach out to the @elastic/observablt-ci