Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x](backport #42127) [Filebeat] aws-s3 - Document _id generation behavior #42130

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 8.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Preview link: https://beats_bk_42127.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/guide/en/beats/filebeat/master/filebeat-input-aws-s3.html

Proposed commit message

Document the details about how the Filebeat aws-s3 input generates
Elasticsearch document _id values.

Add a subsection for the configuration examples.

Move "Common configuration" section immediately after the input
configuration options.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Related issues

Screenshots

Before After
Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 16 46 10 Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 17 45 07

This is an automatic backport of pull request #42127 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Document the details about how the Filebeat aws-s3 input generates
Elasticsearch document _id values.

Add a subsection for the configuration examples.

Move "Common configuration" section immediately after the input
configuration options.

(cherry picked from commit 20a1776)
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Dec 19, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Dec 19, 2024
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Dec 19, 2024

This pull request doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Dec 23, 2024

This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @andrewkroh? 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant