-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add co-authoring commits section to code-review #62
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Hugo Gruson <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Only seeing this now as I've been away. I'm not sure I understand the use-case for the procedure decribed here. In reviews, accepted reviewer suggestions such as typo fixes are automatically co-authored commits, and any larger contributions are typically as PRs which also credit authors. Would it help to add to this section to say when manual crediting is needed - is there a common case I'm overlooking? |
Agreed that in most cases, co-authorship is automatic by GitHub, however, when using suggestions in another PR the manual co-authorship is required: the use-case is outlined in Blueprints here: https://github.com/epiverse-trace/blueprints/blob/main/code-review.qmd#L32 |
Ah I see thanks, sounds good. |
This PR adds a section detailing how to give recognition to collaborators through co-authoring commits. It is similar to
the As commit co-authors section in the Roles in package DESCRIPTION page, but the new additions give more details on some of the technical aspects of how to co-author commits.
This is information I've compiled that has helped me when suggestions are made in a PR but the changes are made on a different branch.