Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Answers Pectra FAQ questions #324

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/wiki/pectra-faq.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The MaxEB feature will allow the user to have a > 32ETH effective balance. This

With EIP-7702, The user wallet would be able to delegate control to a smart contract. This pattern allows a new wallet and app interaction design space, leading the path for future full account abstraction solutions.

The Execution layer triggered exits feature allows the withdrawal address set in the `0x02` withdrawal credential is able to perform exits directly in the execution layer without any reliance on pre-signed BLS keys. This feature is mainly targetted at staking pools, who would be able to use smart contracts to fully control the validator lifecycle.
The Execution layer triggered exits feature allows the withdrawal address set in the `0x02` withdrawal credential is able to perform exits directly in the execution layer without any reliance on pre-signed BLS keys. This feature is mainly targeted at staking pools, who would be able to use smart contracts to fully control the validator lifecycle.
taxmeifyoucan marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Users/Devs
---
Expand Down
Loading