Update EIP-7642: add earliestBlock and update receipts encoding #9237
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
c-update
File
|
eth-bot
changed the title
lightclient
reviewed
Jan 14, 2025
| title: eth/69 - Drop pre-merge fields | ||
| description: Drop unnecessary fields after the merge | ||
| title: eth/69 - history expiry and simpler receipts | ||
| description: Adds history serving window and removes bloom filter in receipt | ||
| author: Marius van der Wijden (@MariusVanDerWijden), Felix Lange <[email protected]> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| author: Marius van der Wijden (@MariusVanDerWijden), Felix Lange <[email protected]> | |
| author: Marius van der Wijden (@MariusVanDerWijden), Felix Lange (@fjl) |
this allows you to merge changes to the eip via the bot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I know but I want to discuss a bit before merging.
jflo
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here I am updating the eth/69 proposal with two changes:
Simplifying the receipts encoding. The original EIP proposed a new format for receipts with the bloom filter removed. It did that by mirroring the complex encoding for typed receipts which is also used by Ethereum consensus. Since the network protocol now introduces a deviation from the encoding used by consensus, there is no need to make it so complex.
Ultimately all receipt types contain the same four fields. So with this update, I am changing the network encoding to be the same for all receipt types.
I am adding a new field
earliestBlockin theStatusmessage. This is somewhat similar to EIP-7542, which proposed adding ablockRange.