-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 773
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
evm: verkle testing extraction #3817
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
historyServeWindow: 8192, // The amount of blocks to be served by the historical blockhash contract | ||
systemAddress: '0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe', // The system address |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to have both of these parameters since they are identical?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will admit that I've been a bit confused with regards to those two addresses. I've played around when troubleshooting so this is a remnant of that. I've adjusted it so that it matches the EIP: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2935
// config | ||
historyStorageAddress: '0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe', // The address where the historical blockhashes are stored | ||
historyStorageAddress: '0x0aae40965e6800cd9b1f4b05ff21581047e3f91e', // The address where the historical blockhashes are stored |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why doesn't this match the EIP 2935 address?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left ts as is but adjusted the eip 2935 one from evm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few questions/clean up items we should address before merging.
Co-authored-by: acolytec3 <[email protected]>
…hereumjs/ethereumjs-monorepo into evm/verkle-testing-extraction
I think all has been addressed! Ready for re-review/merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Ty! It seems like the PR wasn't approved, can you re-approve? thanks! |
This PR extracts some verkle work from #3716 so that the other PR can remain scoped on running verkle tests.