Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump external-datastores job timeout from 20 to 30 min #5677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor

@adamsachs adamsachs commented Jan 16, 2025

unticketed

Description Of Changes

external-datastores job is timing out on main, possibly due to the GH runner upgrades to python 3.12 (since we now have to install python manually?) -- this seems unlikely upon further investigation, more likely is we added tests to increase the runtime of the job but it hadn't been running for a few days due to the python upgrade issue, so that increase in timing was being obfuscated.

at least as a temporary measure, we can bump the timeout to hopefully avoid the timeout and get this job passing again

Code Changes

  • bumped timeout on external-datastores job from 20 to 30 min

Steps to Confirm

  1. let's see how the job does on CI on this PR nevermind, forgot to put the run unsafe ci checks label on so external-datastores was skipped. let's just get this merged and test it on main, it's a very low risk change 👍

Pre-Merge Checklist

  • Issue requirements met
  • All CI pipelines succeeded
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
    • Add a db-migration This indicates that a change includes a database migration label to the entry if your change includes a DB migration
    • Add a high-risk This issue suggests changes that have a high-probability of breaking existing code label to the entry if your change includes a high-risk change (i.e. potential for performance impact or unexpected regression) that should be flagged
  • Followup issues:
    • Followup issues created (include link)
    • No followup issues
  • Database migrations:
    • Ensure that your downrev is up to date with the latest revision on main
    • Ensure that your downgrade() migration is correct and works
      • If a downgrade migration is not possible for this change, please call this out in the PR description!
    • No migrations
  • Documentation:
    • Documentation complete, PR opened in fidesdocs
    • Documentation issue created in fidesdocs
    • If there are any new client scopes created as part of the pull request, remember to update public-facing documentation that references our scope registry
    • No documentation updates required

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fides-plus-nightly ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 16, 2025 0:43am

@adamsachs adamsachs added the run unsafe ci checks Runs fides-related CI checks that require sensitive credentials label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 16, 2025

fides    Run #11799

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #11799  •  git commit 9998fd6f22 ℹ️: Merge 2661d192c102459eb3524b6a23c0167f24a9839c into 71aa1a2d79b965db9ae892c730d2...
Project fides
Branch Review refs/pull/5677/merge
Run status status check passed Passed #11799
Run duration 00m 58s
Commit git commit 9998fd6f22 ℹ️: Merge 2661d192c102459eb3524b6a23c0167f24a9839c into 71aa1a2d79b965db9ae892c730d2...
Committer Adam Sachs
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 4
⚠️ You've recorded test results over your free plan limit.
Upgrade your plan to view test results.
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor Author

merging even without confirmation on this branch that it solves the problem, since this is a very low risk change - and in the interest of time.

@adamsachs adamsachs merged commit 46cb224 into main Jan 16, 2025
36 of 37 checks passed
@adamsachs adamsachs deleted the asachs/bump-external-datastores-action-timeout branch January 16, 2025 13:01
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 16, 2025

fides    Run #11800

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #11800  •  git commit 46cb2242ac: bump `external-datastores` job timeout from 20 to 30 min (#5677)
Project fides
Branch Review main
Run status status check passed Passed #11800
Run duration 00m 59s
Commit git commit 46cb2242ac: bump `external-datastores` job timeout from 20 to 30 min (#5677)
Committer Adam Sachs
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 4
⚠️ You've recorded test results over your free plan limit.
Upgrade your plan to view test results.
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
run unsafe ci checks Runs fides-related CI checks that require sensitive credentials
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants