Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Breaking change] Strongly typed API or not ? #180

Open
MangelMaxime opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

[Breaking change] Strongly typed API or not ? #180

MangelMaxime opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@MangelMaxime
Copy link
Member

MangelMaxime commented Sep 16, 2019

The last minor version of Fable.React introduced several breaking changes.

From a user perspective, this is not really friendly so I think it is time to decide if we want to fully type the API or no :)

Because nowadays, my user code looks like a mismatch between several concepts. I can take the subject to explore typed API if this is the way to go. And make it works with SSR etc.

@Luiz-Monad
Copy link
Contributor

Luiz-Monad commented Oct 4, 2019

I saw this, it was easy to fix, just replace some "strings" with the new enums. But as I was updating everything to the bleeding edge, I kind of expected it.
I guess we could type all the CSS properties and then release a major version, breaking changes in the minor version breaks the Semantic Versioning, it's not nice.

@MangelMaxime
Copy link
Member Author

I guess we could type all the CSS properties and then release a major version, breaking changes in the minor version breaks the Semantic Versioning, it's not nice.

Yes, I want to avoid this situation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants